Quantcast
Channel: Benefit fraud
Viewing all 1267 articles
Browse latest View live

Our wide open benefits system

$
0
0
A failed Algerian asylum seeker who used five fake identities to fraudulently claim £370,000 in benefits has been jailed for five years.

Saif Boudemagh, 41, used a forged French identity card to illegally enter the UK in March, 2000 but his asylum appeal failed.

Boudemagh continued to appeal and eventually obtained residency in 2004, two years after marrying UK citizen Paula Boudemagh.

The father-of-one, was given a one-bed council flat in Upper Holloway, London and immediately began claiming benefits once he received his National Insurance number.

He claimed to be the carer of his wife and since February, 2009 claimed Income Support as single-parent of their son, now aged fourteen years-old.

The bogus claimant who received full British citizenship in October, 2007 was convicted of twelve counts of fraud by a Blackfriars Crown Court jury totalling £370,000.

As well as his own bogus applications Boudemagh made up people and claimed benefits for them.

Between June, 2007 and April, 2015 he made multiple claims using fake French identities for Housing Benefit.

He used the same names to apply for council tax benefits, income support, carer's allowance, incapacity benefit, employment support allowance, (ESA) and disability living allowance, (DLA).

He pocketed £16,798 for looking after non-existent friend called Jamel Bensaid, 42, whose id was used to get a staggering £174,000 in various benefits.

Benefit claims were made in the name of Sidhamad Ayad, 39. This identity netted the con artist a £41,746 in employment support benefits after Boudemagh concocted a bogus tale this claimant needed a walking stick and toilet hand rails. Another £14,251 was paid out in disability living allowance for the same man and £22,519 was given in housing benefit.

He also used fake French identity documents to make benefit claims in name of Allel Zerabib, 44, and Taric Ziad, 45, and 'hijacked' the genuine identity of Frenchwoman Nadia Regad, 42.

The married mum-of-two was living in Paris, but her identity was used to claim £4,235 as a carer for 'Mr Zerabib' who received £25,000 in disability benefits. This bogus identity was also exploited to collect £46,000 in housing benefit and council tax benefit.

Boudemagh pocketed a further £14,626 in DLA using the Ziad identity.

The DWP paid benefits on the basis the claimants had depression, schizophrenia, anxiety, varicose veins, lower back pain and in one case a disabled finger.

He even used a disabled Freedom Pass in a false identity to enjoy free transport around the capital.

Boudemagh's flat was raided on April 7, 2015 and documents were found in the names of the false claimants as well as bank cards for accounts the money was paid into.

Boudemagh told the jury he was innocently completing benefit claim forms as an English-speaker for members of the close-knit north London Algerian community. But it was found the people did not exist.

The prosecution argued its case successfully, having the Algerian convicted on all but five counts.

Prosecutor Mr Andrew Evans said: 'A false French passport was also submitted as proof of identity in support of these claims and the photo on this passport is that of the defendant. His mobile phone number is given as the claimants' contact number.'

The conman's brother Redouane Boudemagh, 46, an illegal immigrant, receiving three years imprisonment for a £218,000 scam last year.

Shockingly, Boudemagh was still in receipt of housing benefit and child tax credits up to the day of his imprisonment, but he will not face confiscation proceedings because no assets have been found. The DWP say the only way they can recover any money is by making small deductions to any benefits he receives after his release.

'This defendant played a leading role in the offending, involving at least one other,' said Mr. Evans. 'It was a sophisticated offence requiring planning and the hijacking of identities to claims benefits and completion of medical evidence.'

Judge Jane Sullivan told him last week: 'It cannot be said you showed remorse. You fought the case in the face of overwhelming evidence.'

Source with pictures

Deportation should beckon. But probably won't.

Council tax fraudsters in court

$
0
0
A benefit cheat spent hundreds a month on luxury hire cars while claiming council tax support - but now he has faced justice.

Jamie Lee Roberts, from Great Cambourne, appeared at Cambridge Magistrates’ Court last week (Thursday, May 10).

The 44-year-old was prosecuted after telling South Cambridgeshire District Council he earned around £20,000 less than he actually did while self-employed during the 2015/16 tax year, to obtain council tax support.

He also over-estimated his allowable expenditure. These two dishonest statements led to Roberts claiming more than £1,900 in Council Tax Support on the basis that he was in receipt of low income.

However, a benefits assessment officer discovered that Roberts was spending more than £800 a month on luxury hire vehicles, despite claiming this support.

Further investigations also revealed that Mr Roberts had holidayed abroad and concealed personal spending in undeclared bank accounts.

Due to the false statements made by Roberts, he claimed £1,922 in assistance from the authority which he was not entitled to.

Appearing in court, he pleaded guilty to a total of four offences and was fined £746. He must also pay back the full amount to the council, pay £455.55 to cover the authority’s costs and pay a victim surcharge of £50.

=====

In a separate case at the court, Kelly Myson, 28, was fraudulently claiming Council Tax support and single person discount on the basis that she was a single mother on a low income.

However, she did not tell South Cambridgeshire District Council that her partner, who was in paid employment, was also living at her address.

As a result, she falsely claimed reductions of £1,416 via Council Tax support between August 2016 and October 2017. Additionally, single person discount of £209 was also paid on the basis that Ms Myson was living as a single person.

The investigation that led to Ms Myson appearing in court began after she indicated to a district council department, separate to the benefits team, that her partner was living with her.

In court, she pleaded guilty and was fined £80. She must also pay £50 to cover the Council’s court costs, a victim surcharge of £30 and pay back the full amount owed.

Source

Immigrant took council flat when she owned a property

$
0
0
A self-confessed cheating council tenant who raked in £31,000 renting her private flat claims she will be made homeless - because she has to pay it all back.

The News caught up with Irina Serstena after she appeared before Peterborough Crown Court for the outcome of a Proceeds Of Crime Act application.

The 41-year-old, who is from Latvia, had been renting out a flat she owned while living in a coucil property in St Neots.

Serstena, who now lives in the flat she owns in Gabriel Court, Peterborough, was living in the council flat in Loves Way.

She pleaded guilty to two offences under the Fraud Act 2006 by applying for social housing when she already owned a property.

Huntingdonshire District Council’s Corporate Fraud Team discovered Serstena bought the flat in August 2011 and failed to declare this to the council while applying for social housing.

She continued to bid for social housing and in October 2011 successfully and illegally bid for the Loves Way property, moving there in November 2011 while renting out the flat she owned for the last six years.

Serstena originally appeared at court on December 15, 2017 and, as a result of pleading guilty, was sentenced to a 12-month community order concurrent in respect of each offence with a requirement for 150 hours unpaid work.

She did her community service in a charity shop.

She told the News: "I was thinking at the hearing that no one listened to my story or even asked about it. What I have done is wrong and I feel terrible about that and I regret it but there is another side to the story.

"When I arrived in the UK after Latvia joined the EU in 2004 and I came to this country to seek a better life. To start with I did what they said with all the immigration rules and signed up for the working scheme and spent years before I could apply for the residents' permit.

"It took six years before I could get leave to remain. We were not allowed to ask for benefits or apply for a council property and i lived in shared houses and worked hard."

She said: "I was struggling and someone said the council would help and I applied to get on the waiting list. I was on it for five years and nothing happened. I did bid for several flats but didn't get them. I thought I'd never get one.

"I moved into a one bedroom maisonette and was working in a supermarket but after rent and bills, I had nothing left. I would have no money five days after I was paid and I asked the council for help but they said they couldn't help me.

"I moved in with friends and let the council know. The friends had to leave the flat and so did I and I told the council I was being made homeless. I asked again for help twice and they didn't help.

"Then I asked my mum for help. I had been sending money home to her in Latvia and she had saved it all up. She gave it back to me and that's when I put the deposit down on the flat in Peterborough.

"I forgot to notify the council and I really didn't think it mattered as it had never offered me a flat. The property I bought looked good at first but was in a bad state and I had to spend a lot fixing it up.

"Then out of the blue the council called me up and asked if I still needed a flat - I stupidly said yes I need it. So I moved into the St Neots property and started renting the Peterborough flat as I wasn't working and had no money.

"I thought I'd give up the council property when I can move into the Peterborough flat but had a tricky time with the tenants and the flat flooded and I had to wait for the insurance money to totally refurbish it and that's when the problem started because I was caught by the fraud team and taken to court.

"I now have to pay back £33,000 and will have to sell my flat to do it and then will probably be homeless and have to apply for another council flat.

"I am a taxi driver and work 60 hours a week but my last year's wage was £14,000.

"It wasn't my intention to cheat someone. To survive as a single person is tough. I can apologise but do not judge me or you will be judged because you don't know what's going to happen tomorrow and I cannot change what has happened."

On April 13, His Honour Judge Lowe made a confiscation order for Serstena to pay £31,184.62 in full within six months or face a one year prison sentence. Costs of £1,200 were also awarded to the council.

She said: "I have put the flat on the market as I have to pay back the £33,000 by October. If I don't sell the flat I don't know what I will do and my accountant says I may only have £5,000 left after selling the flat and paying the money back."

Oliver Morley, the council's corporate director of services, said: "We work hard to ensure cheats are not going to get away with it in Huntingdonshire. We take housing those that need it very seriously and, as this case shows, we use all powers at our disposal to pursue those that illegally claim help they are not entitled to.”

Source with pictures and video

Probation officer admitted benefit fraud

$
0
0
A probation officer pocketed more than £7,000 in benefits after failing to tell authorities that she was in work.

Tara Gale, 38, wrongly claimed Employment and Support Allowance and Housing Benefit for a year by not declaring she was in paid employment.

Judge Neil Bidder QC warned her she could go to prison for her offending.

Cardiff Crown Court heard she committed benefit fraud between February 2015 and February 2016.

Nuhu Gobir, prosecuting, said she dishonestly intended to make a gain for herself by failing to disclose her circumstances.

The court heard she applied to the DWP in February 2015 for Employment and Support Allowance. Prosecutors said that claim was made on the basis she was unable to work due to ill health, single and had no income or savings. They argued it was fraudulent from the outset.

Mr Gobir said: “Her claim was assessed and authorised.”

He told the court information “came to light” suggesting she was working as a probation officer when she made the initial claim. An investigation began and she was interviewed under caution.

Prosecutors said she was “surprised” when investigators suggested she was in work while claiming benefits.

Gale stated she had not done it intentionally and told them she had problems with her memory. She said in court she was temping at the time of the initial application.

The court heard she fraudulently claimed a total of £7,351.70 from the DWP and Bridgend council.

Prosecutors said she had no previous convictions, but a caution for shoplifting in 2016.

Mr Gobir requested £1,200 towards prosecution costs.

Judge Bidder asked if any of the money had been paid back and he replied: “Not as far as the prosecution know.”

Gale, from Bridgend, pleaded not guilty to two counts of benefit fraud at a hearing in December last year, but changed her pleas in April.

The judge noted there was evidence she may have “underlying mental health problems”.

He said he would take the unusual step of deferring sentence for 20 weeks.

In that time, she must engage with mental health services and make arrangements with the DWP to make regular re-payments.

Judge Bidder said: “If she complies to the letter with these requirements, I would expect not to send her to prison immediately at the end of the deferment period. If she does not, she can expect to go to prison. It is as simple as that.”

She was granted bail until her next appearance on October 4.

Source

Pensioner admits benefit frauds

$
0
0
A Southsea pensioner who fleeced the taxpayer out of more than £10,000 after committing benefit fraud for more than a decade has been spared jail.

Bernard Lee, 71, admitted three charges of making a false statement to obtain benefits with him pocketing cash he was not entitled to from council tax, pension credit and housing benefit.

Portsmouth Crown Court heard Lee had claimed for pension credits since 2006, despite having two occupational pensions.

He also claimed for housing benefit in the same year before receiving money for council tax from 2010. In total Lee, of previous good character, defrauded Portsmouth City Council out of £10,786.70 in overpayments he received during the period before he was caught, prosecutor Lucy Conroy said.

‘His first pension started before he made his first claim so it appears the fraud began at this time,’ Mrs Conroy said. ‘He has since made repayments of over £3,000 with more than £7,000 remaining.’

Judge Robert Hill sentenced Lee to three months in prison but suspended the term for one year. He said: ‘You were dishonestly claiming benefit for what you were not entitled to and you failed to disclose your pensions. You said you were only aware of making a false claim when it was pointed out to you. This was serious because it went on for a number of years, though the earnings were quite modest. You have started to pay some of it back after being caught, but there remains money which is still outstanding.’

Source

Benefit cheat who stole more than £1,600 handed 16-week curfew

$
0
0
A benefit cheat has been sentenced to a 16-week curfew after stealing more than £1,600 from Warrington Borough Council.

Emma Peacey appeared at Warrington Magistrates' Court, where she pleaded guilty to dishonestly claiming council tax support.

The 37-year-old committed the offence on September 12, 2013, when she stated she was a single parent – a statement that was untrue as at that time she was married and living with husband Lee Peacey.

The council tax support overpayment raised for this offence amounted to £1,627.69.

Peacey had originally been offered a financial penalty for committing the offence as an alternative to being prosecuted and gaining a criminal record.

She accepted this, however failed to pay the penalty although being given several opportunities and clearly being told the consequences of non-payment.

The magistrates sentenced Peacey to a curfew from the hours of 9pm to 6am for 16 weeks which started immediately.

She was also fined £85 victim surcharge, £500 in costs and ordered to repay the original overpayment in full.

Source

Pensioner with inheritance claimed benefit

$
0
0
A benefit cheat pocketed more than £10,000 despite having an £85,000 inheritance in the bank, a court heard.

Nigel Collins claimed housing benefit from Rossendale Council on the grounds that he was in receipt of pension credit.

Prosecutor Tracey Yates told Burnley Magistrates Court that he started claiming housing benefit legitimately from October 2005, however he failed to tell the council about the £85,000 inheritance windfall from his father.

The court heard how the former lorry driver was overpaid £10,224.46 between April 2014 and July 2017. Collins pleaded guilty to dishonestly failing to notify of a change in circumstances affecting his entitlement to housing benefit.

Magistrates said they would not impose a custodial sentence because Collins had repaid all the money. The 69-year-old was given a two-month curfew order and ordered to pay £85 costs.

Miss Yates told the court that Collins was interviewed by the authorities in December 2017 and said his father had left him the inheritance money.

The court heard how Collins ‘didn’t consider it to be a change in circumstances and didn’t consider it to be savings’.

Miss Yates said: “It has been repaid by the defendant in full. The claim wasn’t fraudulent from the outset.”

Defence solicitor Cathryn Fell said Collins’ best mitigation was his early guilty plea and repaying all the money.

She said: “It wasn’t money he saved up himself so he didn’t think that was something he needed to declare.”

Miss Fell said Collins was going through a ‘traumatic time in his life’ and also sustained a neck injury at his home 15 years ago leaving him unable to work. A probation service officer who interviewed Collins at court said he ‘accepts full responsibility and continues to deny intent to commit the fraud’. He told the court: “He does have negative views of benefit fraud and said that if he had known then he would have reported the change of circumstances.

“It’s an isolated incident and out of character. He presents as a very low risk of reoffending.”

Sentencing, the magistrates said: “This was a lot of money that went missing but the big fact here is that you have paid it back very quickly and without fuss.”

Source with picture

Woman fined for illegal sub-letting

$
0
0
A Sheffield woman has been fined almost £10,000 for illegally sub-letting her council house, while she was living in a housing association property nearby.

Haffiza Khan, 49, sub-let her council tenancy at Netherthorpe while living in a South Yorkshire Housing Association property nearby.

Khan pleaded guilty to unlawfully subletting her council tenancy during a hearing at Sheffield Magistrates' Court. She received a 12-month conditional discharge and was ordered to pay back £8740 for unlawfully subletting as well as £150 costs in costs and a victim surcharge of £20.

Mrs Khan gave notice on her council tenancy in December last year following an interview under caution where evidence of the sub-letting allegation was presented to her.

Councillor Jim Steinke, cabinet member for neighbourhoods and community safety, said: “Social housing provides security and stability to millions of families. There is an ever-increasing demand for social housing and Sheffield City Council is committed to investigating all suspected cases of tenancy fraud to ensure properties are lawfully occupied. We are pleased that Mrs Khan acknowledged her wrong-doing at an early opportunity and hope this sentence will discourage others from profiting in this way, enabling homes to go to the people who need them most.”

Unlawful subletting is when a tenant lets out their council home without the knowledge or permission of their local authority or landlord. The tenant will often continue to pay rent whilst charging the sub-tenant a much higher rent and may also have requested the sub-tenant pay a ‘bond’, something which a local authority does not request of its tenants.

Subletting a council tenancy is in breach of the Council’s Conditions of Tenancy and is also a criminal offence covered by the Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Act 2013. As a result of this legislation those found guilty of unlawfully subletting a Council tenancy can face hefty fines, a criminal record and in extreme cases a possible prison sentence. Sheffield City Council has a zero tolerance of this offence and if found guilty the offender will also be excluded from the Council’s rehousing registration list.

Source

lllegal sub-letting of social housing is a wicked crime. It's not just the (considerable amount of) money - people and families who need a home are being deprived of it.

Woman jailed for benefit fraud

$
0
0
A 54-year-old woman who claimed almost £35,000 in benefits over five years has been jailed.

Mary Mitchell, from Old Kilpatrick, appeared for sentencing at Dumbarton Sheriff Court for obtaining the Jobseekers Allowance, and housing and council tax benefits between February 2010 and October 2015.

She previously pleaded guilty to the charges after the case was reduced from a solemn matter that would have gone in front of a jury.

Sentencing had been delayed after it became apparent Mitchell had significant hearing difficulties and she was aided last week by an assistant typing out what was said by court officials so Mitchell could read it on a computer screen in front of her.

Her defence solicitor, Brian McGuire, acknowledged the hearing troubles were the only mitigating factor preventing her going to jail.

Mr McGuire said Mitchell developed an alcohol problem after 2000 and it got worse before getting married to her husband.

The drinking got so bad, her husband left the home for a number of years.

Twice Mitchell was admitted to hospital and given a “stark warning” she would “kill herself” if she continued to drink, and she lost three jobs as a result of her addiction.

Eventually she managed to get off the drink and her husband returned home.

But Mitchell didn’t acknowledge to officials that she was no longer living alone and that her husband was working.

Mr McGuire said: “She accepted her guilt but there was a dispute about the background. The parties are doing what they can to pay it back. Her husband had been paying back £30 a month for two years. I think it would take 30 years to repay this. There’s a stark choice. Does it have to be custody? People go to prison that fall into the category that shouldn’t go to prison.”

But Sheriff John Hamilton noted the social work report on Mitchell didn’t mention the hearing problem at all and that the Court of Appeal was clear that jail was the appropriate sentence for fraud amounts over £20,000.

The sheriff paused for a long period as he considered his options but said he had to consider the public protection element.

He said: “It’s not just about her. It’s the matter of the message sent out to the public. This is a very difficult case. For five years, you knowingly defrauded two support funds to the tune of £35,000 and no real reason for it has been put forward. That’s a significant sum. I accept you have no previous convictions and you may have health problems. But I feel compelled that this level of defrauding public funds is very much towards the top end of the scale.”

Mitchell was jailed for six months, reduced from 10 months because she pleaded guilty.

Source

Parent pretended to be single in benefit fraud

$
0
0
A mother who claimed she was 'incapable of work' managed to get £12,000 in single parent benefits despite living with her fiance of five years.

Jodene Newton, 25, claimed her five-year relationship with National Grid worker Colin McLellan wasn't stable enough to notify the DWP and denied living with him when questioned.

On her Facebook page she says she has been engaged to him since 2013.

Magistrates in Burnley, Lancashire, were told how Mr McLellan gave the National Grid his address as Padiham, which was Newton's home, the defendant was his emergency contact and HSBC also had the same address for McLellan and a loan was taken out there.

Prosecutor Tracy Yates told the hearing Newton was in receipt of Universal Credit from February 8, 2016 until July 7, 2017.

She got it on the basis she was a lone parent, incapable of work and had no other income.

Evidence showed she failed to declare a change in circumstances and was maintaining a 'common household' with Mr McLellan between August 8, 2016 and July 7, 2017.

Mrs Yates said: 'When the defendant was interviewed on June 29, 2017, she denied she was living with him. In her second interview, on August 2, 2017, she admitted she had been dishonest in her first interview, saying the relationship was on and off and following arguments he would leave and stay with friends and would return after a few days or a week.'

The prosecutor added Newton, who had a previous conviction for common assault, was overpaid £11,658,19.

Laura Heywood, defending Newton, said she had been in a very turbulent relationship, which was on and off.

The solicitor said: 'She thought that her relationship wasn't stable enough to notify the DWP. It was that background that led to her failing to notify the benefits agency. It wasn't a fraud from the outset. Over time, he has gradually stayed more and more.'

Miss Heywood said the defendant, who was fostering a child and worked self-employed making baby castings, was paying back the DWP at £80 a month.

She said: 'It was a relatively short period as far as benefit fraud is concerned.'

The lawyer added: 'Mr McLellan is now living there full-time. The benefits agency are fully aware of that. '

Newton admitted dishonesty failing to promptly notify the DWP of a change in circumstances. She was sentenced to a 12-month community order with 100 hours unpaid work and must pay an £85 victim surcharge.

Source with pictures

Small fine for sub-letting council flat

$
0
0
A council house tenant has been fined after admitting subletting his Exeter home.

Dave Kelly, from Farnborough, admitted subletting his council flat in Clifton Road, Exeter, from September 28 2014 until August 2016.


He pleaded guilty to the offence at Plymouth Magistrates Court and was fined £325, ordered to pay back the £5,985 he gaoned by subletting the property, a victim surcharge of £32 and £450 costs.

The court heard that at the time of the offence, Kelly was working away in Hampshire where he was staying with his girlfriend.

He decided to sublet his council property to a friend of his mother and arranged for the unlawful sub-tenant to pay £540 a month into his bank account. This amount was later increased to £590 and then £610 a month.

An investigation, carried out by Plymouth City Council Fraud Team on behalf of the Devon Tenancy Fraud Group, was started after an anonymous telephone caller alleged that the tenant was not occupying the property but was instead sub-letting it to someone else.

After the case, an Exeter City Council spokesman said that social housing fraud costs the UK economy £1.8 billion a year:
At a time when social housing is at a premium, this criminal behaviour is totally unacceptable. Exeter City Council has a zero tolerance approach to fraud and will continue to protect the public purse. Fraudulent activity diverts money and resources from those who legitimately have need of council services and contributes to higher council tax bills.
Source

In old news ...

Naughty granny

$
0
0
A grandmother illegally claimed almost £9,000 in housing benefits from Wyre Council.

Joanna Horsley became a benefit cheat when she failed to disclose that her husband was working.

When interviewed by benefit fraud investigators, she said medical problems she had had affected her memory.

The fraud investigators then pointed out to her that she only seemed to report changes that were advantageous to her. Horsley, 45, from Cleveleys, pleaded guilty to dishonestly failing to notify a change in her circumstances.

She was sentenced to a four-week tagged curfew from 7pm to 7am and ordered to pay £85 costs with £85 victims’ surcharge.

Prosecutor, Pam Smith, said Horsley had illegally claimed £8,820 in housing benefit between October 2015 and February last year.

She had told the authorities when her partner no longer worked for a double glazing company and he had only received carer’s allowance for her. She also informed the authorities when he had moved out of the household for a time, but she failed to disclose it when he first started work for a postal delivery firm.

Allan Cobain, defending, said his client, who had no previous convictions, suffered from a myriad of medical conditions and walked with a stick.

Source

£35k benefit fraudster ordered to repay the full amount

$
0
0
A man who committed a £35,000 benefit fraud on his return from a life in Spain has failed in his bid to reduce the amount he must pay back.

Michael Dugdale, 69, was previously handed two suspended prison sentences and ordered to fully repay the wrongfully claimed cash, after a court heard he failed to declare that he owned half a property in Mazarron, Murcia.

DWP fraud teams based in the UK and Spain launched an investigation into his claim after an anonymous tip off.

At the time Dugdale admitted two counts of benefit fraud, stating his dire economic situation on his return to the UK from Spain in 2007 had left him no choice but to make a bogus claim for a benefit he knew he was not entitled to. Upon his return to the country, the father-of-one, who grew up in Ribbleton, Preston, and attended Ribbleton Hall High School, failed to declare his share of the Spanish property when making a claim for Pension Credit in 2007.

He was ordered to repay the funds in full at a subsequent Proceeds of Crime Act hearing or face imprisonment. He launched a bid at Preston Crown Court to vary the order on the basis he no longer has the assets. It is understood he claims to have spent all but £15,000 of his £46,000 share of a house in Spain on more pressing debts.

Judge Philip Parry refused his application.

Source

Recidivist benefit thief mother told to expect jail

$
0
0
A mother of three convicted of a £107,000 benefits scam attended her trial with the words “what goes around comes around” tattooed on her arm.

Jennie Andrews also sported the words “what doesn’t kill you makes you stronger”.

But she has now been warned to prepare herself for custody.

Andrews, 34, from Connah’s Quay, admitted two charges but was convicted by a jury of a third allegation which meant a total overpayment of £107, 738.

It occurred between 2008 and 2016 and involved income support and housing benefit, prosecuting barrister Sion ap Mihangel told a Mold Crown Court jury.

Robin Boag, defending, said she denied being dishonest when she filled a form in November 2013 because it was her case that at the time she was not cohabiting and maintaining a common household. It was her case that it only later became dishonest when Jody Robinson moved in and she had admitted that, he explained.

After she was unanimously convicted by the jury, Judge Niclas Parry rebailed her pending sentence in two weeks’ time and ordered a full pre-sentence report from the probation service.

The court then heard she had a previous conviction for making false representation to obtain benefit in 2002 and had received a conditional discharge.

Judge Parry said it was right that the jury should know that he had indicated before the trial that if she helped herself and pleaded guilty then he could consider a non-custodial sentence.

She was a mother of three and every effort was always made not to send mothers into custody but she had made a decision and had been convicted. It was a very serious example of benefit fraud, he said.

Judge Parry warned Andrews that she needed to make arrangements for the care of her children for when she came back to court for sentence on June 21.

Prosecutor Sion ap Mihangel said the defendant claimed a significant amount of benefits and misled Flintshire Council and the Department for Work and Pensions as to her true living arrangements.

From about 2005 onwards she applied for and was paid income support and housing benefit.

“These claims were granted on the basis that she was in receipt of low income and that she was a lone parent with caring responsibilities,” he said.

She signed a declaration stating that the information she had provided was accurate and true.

Andrews was told that if her circumstances changed she should promptly notify the relevant authorities.

Evidence included addresses used for her and her partner Mr Robinson, from a child’s birth certificate, bank details and correspondence from a property managing company which showed they maintained a common household.

He said the change of circumstances would have “impacted significantly” on the amount of benefit she was entitled to. “The amount of overpayment, the prosecution say, which applies in this case is £107,738.87,” he said.

Andrews accepted there came a point when she failed to notify the authorities, but disputed that it was for the length of time suggested by the prosecution.

Interviewed, she initially denied that her partner lived with her. When pressed about his car being seen outside her property, the birth certificate and the circumstances surrounding the rented property, she maintained her account. She said he lived elsewhere and that theirs was a totally platonic relationship and they were just friends. His bank statements were sent to her address but that was because he did not want them going to his home address, where he lived with his wife, she said in interview.

She then admitted that he did live with her, but that it had been in the last year only. Andrews said she had not mentioned it because she was afraid her benefits would be reduced.

Source with pictures

Woman on benefits didn't declare inheritance

$
0
0
A woman took her family on a £15,000 Disneyland holiday while falsely claiming benefits after failing to mention to the authorities she had inherited more than £170,000.

Christine Angell, 61, fraudulently claimed nearly £50,000 in housing benefit and employment and support allowance, telling investigators she did not think she was obliged to declare "gifts".

Speaking at Cardiff Crown Court , her counsel Aled Watkins said she "buried her head in the sand".

The court heard she wrongly claimed a total of £47,315.97 over a five-and-a-half-year period.

Jeffrey Jones, prosecuting, said the DWP received information that she had "hidden capital" while claiming benefits.

Prosecutors said the benefits were paid on the basis that she would inform the authorities of any changes in her circumstances affecting her entitlement to claim but she made repeated false declarations.

The court heard there was an investigation and the DWP found she was receiving large sums of money, which she did not bring to their attention.

Mr Jones said Angell inherited significant amounts from her brother and partner. Investigators found she had five bank accounts with NatWest and received nearly £40,000 on April 13, 2012, followed by another £20,000, then £15,000 a month later.

In December the following year £50,000 was deposited in her account followed by another £47,000. Prosecutors said she was also receiving regular monthly payments of about £1,000, and sometimes as much as £3,750, from her brother's assets in Switzerland.

The court heard she took her family on holiday to Disneyland, costing £15,000, and there was a second holiday to Orlando.

Angell was interviewed on June 16 last year and denied doing anything wrong. The court heard her brother died in 2008 and her partner died in 2011.

She accepted she had inherited from them but believed she did not have to disclose the amounts as they were "gifts".

Mr Jones said the money was "depleted" and there was no point in the DWP pursuing confiscation proceedings to try and get it back. He made an application for £340 towards prosecution costs.

Prosecutors said they could not argue that she led a "lavish lifestyle" but drew the court's attention to the holidays.

Angell admitted three counts of benefit fraud. Mr Watkins said she had no previous convictions and pleaded guilty at the first opportunity.

He said she took her family on holiday because her partner stated he wanted his money to be spent on the family. Mr Watkins added: "She felt obliged and complied with his wish."

The court heard she was grieving at the time of the offending and was prescribed medication for depression.

Angell's counsel said she has multiple health problems and brought a bag of medication to court as she has to take 12 different tablets a day, including morphine. Mr Watkins added: "Coming to court today has been a very difficult process for her."

He said the case had been "hanging over her head" since June last year and she was told the money would be deducted from her benefits.

Judge Michael Fitton QC asked whether issues surrounding her health had been raised with the Prison Service.

He said he was considering an immediate custodial sentence of around 10 months meaning she would spend five months behind bars.

The judge adjourned the case for further inquiries to be made into the likely short-term and long-term impacts on her health of immediate custody and whether the prison would be able to provide necessary treatment.

She was granted bail until the next hearing on July 4 and warned that bail was no indication as to sentence.

Source with picture

Jail for £24k benefit fraudster

$
0
0
Benefit fraudster Alan Lancaster, from Biddulph, has been sent to prison after he wrongly claimed just over £24,000.

The 63-year-old carried on receiving benefits while he was working - after he failed to tell the authorities he had got a job as a courier.

Now Lancaster, who had no previous convictions, has been jailed for 24 weeks after he admitted three benefit fraud charges.

Magistrates at North Staffordshire Justice Centre heard Lancaster legitimately started claiming Employment Support Allowance and housing benefit when he had to give up work due to a back injury.

Prosecutor Lynne Warrington said: "He did not notify the authorities that he had commenced employment.

"In January 2014 he made an application in respect of the income-based portion of Employment Support Allowance on which he claimed he was not working. However, this was not the case. The total overpayment was £24,770. When he was interviewed under caution he accepted that when he began working he had not notified the Department for Work and Pensions, as he was aware he was due to do.

"He accepted that when he made the application false information was given, which would have affected which benefits he was entitled to."

Lancaster pleaded guilty to two counts of dishonestly failing to notify a change in his circumstances affecting his entitlement to benefits, and dishonestly making a false statement to obtain benefits.

He told a probation officer that when he got the job as a courier he was on a 'zero hours' contract and work was sporadic, so he never felt he was working enough to justify telling the authorities.

Mark Bromley, mitigating, said Lancaster was remorseful and added: "He intends to repay every penny that has been overpaid to him."

Jailing Lancaster, magistrates said that the only appropriate sentence was immediate custody.

Chairman of the bench, Phillip Taylor, said: "It was not for you to judge whether the change in your circumstances needed to be disclosed. This has a damaging effect on the public purse. The public need to maintain confidence in the scrutiny of benefit claimants."

Source

Benefit cheat posted holiday snaps on facebook!

$
0
0
A benefits cheat who had nearly £400,000 in the bank was caught after officials found Facebook pictures of her enjoying lavish foreign holidays.

Teresa Hardy posted snaps of her breaks in Belgium, Lanzarote, Cyprus, Tunisia, France and Spain while she was claiming council tax relief.

Investigators from North West Leicestershire District Council prosecuted the 48-year-old after becoming suspicious about her claims.

Hardy started claiming Council Tax support from the authority in April 2013, saying she had no income other than the employment and support allowance she received. She gained £3,931.23 in council tax reduction benefit, and went on to claim additional discretionary ‘hardship’ payments of £557 and £218 in 2014 and 2015 respectively, due to her income allegedly being so much lower than her outgoings.

Council officers became suspicious in August 2017, and launched an investigation into Hardy’s claims, which have now led to payments over a four year period. They discovered three bank accounts showing a total balance of £374,833, and took to social media to find further evidence.

There officers found evidence on Facebook of the defendant enjoying holidays during the period she was claiming. The search also revealed Hardy to be the owner of a business called Doodle Mania, and a website advertising her as an artist. Hardy, from Ibstock, appeared at Leicester Magistrates’ Court, where she admitted dishonestly claiming council tax reduction and fraudulently receiving further discretionary payments.

‘Exceptional circumstances’ regarding Hardy’s health saw magistrates give her a three-year conditional discharge. A collection order was made which will see Hardy pay the council’s costs of £1,812. The council tax benefit and hardship payments, totalling £4,688.23, are also to be paid back.

After the hearing, the district council’s corporate portfolio holder Nick Rushton said: ‘I hope this sends a message to anyone considering making a fraudulent claim that they won’t get away with it and will be taken to court. This case is particularly galling in that the defendant was spending the money of hardworking taxpayers on extravagant holidays abroad. Thanks to the excellent work of our legal and revenue and benefits teams, this money will now be reclaimed and reinvested into the council services we offer.’

Source with pictures

Benefit fraud case takes years to reach court

$
0
0
A Rossett woman has escaped a jail term after being found guilty of two charges of benefit fraud at Wrexham Magistrates.

Laura Sharpe, 31, had initially entered a not guilty plea for failing to notify the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP) of a change in her circumstances, in relation to income support and housing benefit payments, but was convicted at trial.

Rhian Jackson, prosecuting, said that Sharpe, a mother of two children had fraudulently claimed benefits of more than £10k between December 2014 and March 2016 despite clearly maintaining a common household with her partner, Gareth Dodd.

Ms Jackson said that surveillance of the property was conducted by DWP during February/March 2016 and Mr Dodd was identified by them on 38 separate occasions, both leaving and arriving at the property in either his work van or his silver BMW, which was registered with the DVLA under his name.

Ms Jackson explained there had been lots of evidence against Sharpe, who had been asked on numerous occasions by DWP to update them if her circumstances had changed.

Melissa Griffiths, defending, said that the charges had been hanging over Sharpe for some time, and despite her not guilty plea at trial, now accepted the verdict of the court that she had failed to disclose information to DWP.

On handing Sharpe a 12 month community order, Deputy District Judge Meirion Lewis-Jones said the evidence against Sharpe was overwhelming and as a result had come close to being subjected to prison, with her previous good record going in her favour.

He said: "Benefit fraud is becoming all too prevalent these days, which is depressing."

Part of the community order includes a 15 day rehabilitation requirement with Sharpe also ordered to pay a total of £485.

Source

Man admits repeat benefit fraud

$
0
0
A Frome man who made a claim for benefits and kept pocketing the payment for two and a half years while he was earning money from his own courier business has been given a suspended prison sentence.

Stephen Joseph Ellis committed £15,000 worth of fraud when he didn’t tell the authorities what he was up to.

And it wasn’t until investigators from the Specialist Fraud Division became involved that they tracked his activities via his bank account.

At first he claimed the business belonged to his father, but when he appeared before Somerset Magistrates he confessed that the profits from the business were being paid into his bank account.

Ellis, 62, initially denied the offence but then changed his plea to guilty that on January 11, 2013 at Frome with a view to obtaining a benefit, namely Employment Support Allowance, he dishonestly made a statement or representation to the Department for Work and Pensions which was false, namely he stated he was not working or self-employed.

Emma Lenanton, prosecuting, said that the case arose following the defendant’s claim for Employment Support Allowance where he received an overpayment of £15,219.43 between October 2012 and March 2015.

“The claim was made and there was an application for it to be backdated,” she said. “However in making that claim Ellis failed to declare that he was receiving money from a family run business “NetExpress”. He accepts the claim was fraudulent at the outset and in instances like this a repayment schedule is usually devised.”

Miss Lenanton said the defendant had previous convictions for two offences of failing to notify a change of circumstances affecting benefit payments for which he was given a six week suspended prison sentence.

Defending solicitor Jeffrey Bannister said that Ellis accepted he did fill in the benefit application forms to say he was not working.

“He was ill and his parents wanted to help him so set up this business for him, however when he became ill his mother was doing most of the work on his behalf,” he said. “However it was his business and occasionally he got a bit better and tried to do some work. Eventually they were keeping the business afloat in the hope that in the future Ellis would get better and get back to work, however he was not doing this.”

He said that the business was still in operation and money had been put into his account, however he was not earning any money from it.

Since Ellis was interviewed by police all his benefits had been stopped, but he had been granted Disability Living Allowance for life because of his condition.

“The business had not been successful ever and it has now collapsed,” he added.

A Probation spokesperson said that Ellis took full responsibility for the offence saying that there was quite a substantial amount of money involved.

The magistrates imposed a 12 week suspended prison sentence, suspended for 12 months and also ordered him to pay £85 costs and a £115 victim surcharge.

Source
Viewing all 1267 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>