Quantcast
Channel: Benefit fraud
Viewing all 1267 articles
Browse latest View live

Tenancy fraud & right to buy fraud in Bassetlaw

$
0
0
A Bassetlaw A1 Housing tenant who was living and studying overseas for a number of years has been booted out of the property in a crackdown which has seen three fraudulent tenancies terminated.

An investigation was launched after the A1 Housing tenant applied to buy the property through the Right to Buy scheme - but it was suspected that it was not their main property.

It emerged that the tenant was "spending a considerable amount of time outside of the UK" and that they had been "living and attending university abroad for the majority of their time over a number of years".

Joint investigations by Bassetlaw District Council’s Fraud Investigations Team and A1 Housing - who manage the council's housing stock - uncovered the case and two other cases of tenancy fraud. All three resulted in voluntary terminations of the tenancies.

In the second case, the investigation team uncovered evidence that suggested a tenant was subletting their property. At an interview under caution the tenant admitted that their family had not been living at the property for the last 18 months.

And in the third case, housing officers had suspicions that the male tenant was subletting when, during a routine visit, only women's belongings could be seen in the flat. After initially denying the fraud, the tenant terminated the tenancy and returned the keys to A1 Housing.

Cllr Steve Scotthorne, cabinet member for Housing at Bassetlaw District Council, said: “Tenancy Fraud is illegal and deprives genuine tenants access to a home they may desperately need. The Council’s investigation team and A1 Housing will look closely into any suspicious circumstances and will not hesitate to recover a property, or pursue a criminal prosecution, should they find someone guilty of committing benefit fraud.”

None of the three tenants resulted in criminal prosecutions.

Tenancy cheats can face a fine of up to £50,000 and a prison sentence of up to two years if they are caught committing fraud. But the council says that should tenants voluntarily return the property back to them, they will not face any further legal action.

Tenancy fraud can include unlawfully subletting your property, dishonestly applying for a council property using someone else’s details or false information, continuing to live in a property if that person passes away and you do not have succession rights, or using someone else’s tenancy rights to put in a Right to Buy application.

Source

Bradford counter-fraud team wins award

$
0
0
Investigators who battle fraud across the district have scooped a national award.

Bradford Council’s corporate fraud team investigates fraud against the authority, from disability ‘blue badge’ cheats to thieves who steal Council property.

The team has now won an award for excellence in counter-fraud at this year’s Institute of Revenues, Ratings and Valuation conference.

Over the last two years, the team has carried out more than 1,000 investigations, identified losses of more than £2m and applied 271 prosecutions or sanctions. The team also investigates social housing fraud such as illegal subletting, and has recovered 20 properties in this two-year period.

Bradford Council’s chief executive, Kersten England, said the counter-fraud team did “excellent work”.  She said: “I am delighted that we have received this award in recognition of our robust systems and the vision and hard work of the team.”

Source

Tax-dodging Bexhill madam jailed after retrial

$
0
0
A Bexhill mother who fraudulently claimed more than £37,000 in state benefits while running a 'high-class' escort agency has been jailed for three years at a retrial.

Mother-of-five, Janine Adeleke, 45, of Watermill Lane, was jailed immediately after the conclusion of a three-week trial at Canterbury Crown Court. At the trial Adeleke was found guilty of seven separate counts of fraud, including money laundering, cheating the public revenue, tax credits and benefit fraud. She was convicted after the jury retired for more than 10 and a half hours before returning guilty verdicts by 10-2.

The case was held as a retrial after the Court of Appeal ruled in December 2016 against a previous conviction of September 2015.

Prosecutor Mr Walker told the jury how Adeleke had been married but separated from her husband in 2006. "There followed a traumatic and bitter separation and there can be little doubt that as a consequence the defendant was left much less comfortably off. While claiming benefits she came to run a successful and expensive escort agency which boasted: 'VIP Models of poise, sophistication and stunning good looks for elite gentlemen'. The profits she made from this she never declared." The agency took a cut of 35 per cent from its workers, who were charging between £200 and £2,000 an hour.

While passing the three year sentence, Judge Heather Norton said it would have been longer, but she was “bound by law not to pass a sentence greater than that previously handed down”. Adeleke will only be inside for a few weeks as she has already served nearly half the original sentence.

The judge described Adeleke's crimes as “quite simply breathtaking dishonesty on an extraordinary scale over a lengthy period of time” and said Adeleke’s evidence was “evasive, difficult to follow and contradictory”.

The case was brought to trial after an investigation led by the HMRC revealed that while Adeleke claimed to be unemployed for more than seven years she was in fact running Bexhill-based escort business, Carltons of London. According to investigators, the business claimed to offer ‘high class’ escort services, providing the “finest London escorts to gentlemen of distinction”.

Investigators found that Adeleke had stolen £212,000 in unpaid Income Tax, National Insurance Contributions and tax credits payments by declaring that she had no income. She also fraudulently claimed more than £37,000 in Income Support and other state benefits, and laundered £157,000 of illicit cash.

Investigators also uncovered evidence of lavish spending by Adeleke, with £103,000 spent on beauty treatments, leisure and holidays, and an additional £88,000 spent in high street stores. They also discovered more than £1.2 million had passed through her bank accounts, enabling Adeleke to splash out at least £120,000 on private schools between November 2006 and January 2014, including a school which charges up to £30,000 a year.

Assistant director of the HMRC Fraud Investigation Service Tim Clarke said: “Adeleke broke the law to fund a lavish lifestyle and privately educate her children. She defrauded vital public services and stole benefits designed to help struggling families. She pleaded poverty, but this was far from the truth. She didn’t declare her income because she didn’t want to pay any tax. But she did want to claim state benefits, which are meant to support people on low incomes, and she certainly wasn’t entitled to receive them. As a further deception to hide her income, when Adeleke discovered she was being investigated, she laundered £157,000 through her elderly mother's bank account. Working with our investigation partners at the DWP, and linking benefit claims with tax records, our teams can identify if a claimant is lying about their work and benefit status. But our investigations don’t end when a criminal is convicted, and we are now working to reclaim the money Adeleke stole.”

HMRC say confiscation proceedings have started to reclaim the money stolen by Adeleke.

Source and source

"Illiterate" benefit thief wrote facebook post

$
0
0
A mother described as illiterate scammed £60,000 in welfare after claiming she couldn't understand benefit forms - but celebrated escaping a prison sentence by writing a Facebook post. (h/t Dave)

Susan Williams, 47, who said said she couldn't read or write because she left school, pretended to be a carer for her father, who was actually living in a care home.

Over a six year period, Williams pocked benefit payments for income support while raking in more cash while working as a carer - even submitting a fake national insurance number to mask her identity.

She escaped prison and was handed a suspended jail sentence by a judge who praised her for showing 'some remorse' after 'finding herself in a difficult situation'.

Hours after, Williams took to Facebook to express her gratitude at avoiding jail by writing a lengthy status praising the kindness of her sister and describing the love of her son as her 'rock'. She signed it off saying: 'Escaped jail today. Nearly got me self 18 months me self 18 months **** that no more stupid sh*t for me.'

Earlier, the court heard Williams, 47, from Moston in Manchester, had dishonestly claimed carer's allowance and income support over a six year period, failing to inform the DWP when she started work.

She started legitimately claiming income support as a single mother in 1999 but took up employment as a carer after giving her bosses as a fake national insurance number.

She was pocketing care allowances by caring for her father Bernard but then carried out claiming them after he moved into a residential home.

Prosecutor Hugh Edwards told the court that she didn't have the means to pay back the £59,945 that she had taken, and the DWP were going to be taking civil action.

Mr Edwards said: 'In February 1999 she claimed income support when she was the single and cared for her two children. She later became the carer for her father Bernard Williams in December 2008. But she failed to notify the DWP of changes in her circumstance.

'Her initial claim for carer's allowance was a legitimate one when she started caring for her father in 2008, but he was then taken into a residential home in December 2010 and no longer needed her care. She failed to notify the DWP and continued to receive the carer's allowance.

'She was also in employment for Anne Hardman from the 5 April 2006 to the 3rd October 2010 as a carer. After a break she resumed her employment as Anne Hardman's carer on the 26 December 2011 and continued working for her until 13 May 2012.

'As an aside the defendant provided her employers with a false national insurance number. If this matter had gone to trial then it would be the prosecution case that she had deliberately misled her employers and the DWP to keep them from finding out about her employment.

'She was invited in for an interview on December 10 2014 and during that interview she denied working for Anne Hardman. She accepted that he father had been in a residential care home but she claimed that it was in 2012 which was wrong.

'She claimed that she continued to see her father and take him out from the care home and look after him so as a result she felt she was still entitled to the carer's allowance. As a result of that claim a statement was taken from the residential home her father was in and they confirmed that he had been in the care home since 2010 and he rarely left the home. They also confirmed that Miss Williams did visit her father often attending with Mrs Hardman and her husband.''

The court heard Williams' 13 previous offences on her record including dishonesty matters dating back to October 2000.

Defending Williams, Alistair Reid explained to the court her 16 year old daughter had just given birth to a baby and she would be helping with their care.

He added: 'The defendant has had problems in her life. Her father had to be moved between three different residential homes due to difficulties. Ms Williams took over the role of his carer from her brother and she did provide care for him.

'She did continue to care for him in more detail than is given in the statement from the care home. Her personal mitigation which doesn't excuse her not informing the DWP is that she has educational difficulties having left school at a very young age.

'She is effectively illiterate and the forms that had to be filled in were often done so by friends or family members.

'She does accept that she should have informed them of her change in circumstances. When she applied for the benefits she was entitled to them legitimately. She accepts that she should have told the DWP.

'With regards to the false national insurance number, if that matter had gone to trial then it would have been the defence's position that due to her difficulties with education there could have been a genuine error and it was not intentional.

'I think Ms Williams had a confused faith in the effectiveness of the detection system to identify errors more than the level that is usually expected. She has not been living a lavish lifestyle as a result of the money that she had been given. She accepts the offences that she has pleaded guilty to.

'She has been facing eviction from her current property and will be allowed to stay in there for 8 weeks until she finds somewhere new. She is having to offer additional support to her daughter and granddaughter. She is at a low risk of re-offending.'

Sentencing the judge Mr Recorder Robert Atherton said: 'I don't accept for a minute that you didn't know what you were doing, of course you knew what you were doing you knew what you were entitled to and what you were not when your circumstances changed.

'This went on for a very long time. Two of the charges are in relation to when you were working for Anne Hardman for four and a half years with a break of six months after that. You effectively stole £60,000. The benefits system is there to help people in difficulty and it depends on people being open and honest with the authorities. You were neither.

'You have shown some remorse and you find yourself in a difficult situation - but you have stolen from the community and you must give back to the community.''

Williams who pleaded guilty to benefit fraud was sentenced to 52 weeks in jail suspended for two years. She must also complete 250 hours unpaid work and complete a 12 months supervision order.

In her post on Facebook which she says: 'Love my life and my family.' Williams said: ''Thank u to my sister Jo JO and ste for standing by me for the last two days been my rock my Jo has thank god I AV a sister like her ❤️❤️God know wat I do without gher escape jail today it was the most scares thing I been threw in my life and only person that was there for me was my sister ❤️❤️Nearly got me self 18 months fck that no more stupid shit for me ❤️Love my son Barry for guidin me. he my world my son miss him loads.''

Source with uninteresting pictures

Easy benefit fraud

$
0
0
A mum who swindled more than £75,000 in tax credits to splash out on plastic surgery and luxury American holidays to Las Vegas and Florida has been jailed for two years. (h/t Fraudmanager)

Tammy Gunter, 41, from Cefn Fforest, wrongly claiming tax credits by saying she was single – when she was secretly married to the father of her two children.

A court heard Gunter and her husband Neil Hart, 45, lived a “lavish” lifestyle after wrongly claiming taxpayers’ money.

Prosecutor Nuhu Gobir said Gunter was granted tax credits by saying she was a single mum – and also made false claims for student finance and a £2,000 NHS bursary to train as a nurse.

The court heard the couple splurged the money on holidays to Vegas and Florida in 2011 and 2013 – and took out a US$30,000 loan for a holiday home in the US.

Mr Gobir told the court Gunter also travelled to Eastern Europe to undergo cosmetic plastic surgery.

He said: “She’s also known by her married name, Tammy Hart, and she uses her maiden name in her dealings with public bodies. The defendants were already in a relationship and had been living together as a family since December 5, 1997.”

He said Gunter claimed tax credits for nine years when she was working part-time in a shop and a garage.

Merthyr Tydfil Crown Court heard Gunter even forged a letter purporting to be from HMRC.

Mr Gobir said: “Tammy Gunter made a claim that she was a single person working at least 16 hours per week. She stated that she had two children and no other income. The defendant dishonestly maintained she was single. She enjoyed a lavish lifestyle.”

Gunter was handed £76,008.63 in tax credits between 2007 and 2016.

The court heard she also made fraudulent claims for student funding and an NHS bursary of £2,193 by saying she lived alone, when really she lived with Hart.

Mr Gobir said: “She stated that she was separated and was a single parent with two dependent children. Neil Hart lied about his address to assist Tammy Gunter with the application. The total loss to the public purse in effect is £87,450.”

The court heard that in 2014, Gunter sent a letter to Caerphilly County Borough Council purporting to be on HMRC-headed paper. But council officials became suspicious because it had a number of spelling errors.

The DWP, HMRC and the HS Counter Fraud Service Wales began a joint investigation in January 2015 and Gunter and Hart were arrested.

Gunter admitted being knowingly concerned in fraudulent activity undertaken with a view to obtaining tax credits, one count of forgery and four counts of fraud.

Byron Broadstock, defending Gunter, said the couple had a “tumultuous” relationship.

He said: “Many of the purchases that have been described as extravagant, they are out of the ordinary. They were often gestures in reconciliation.”

He said the plastic surgery “wasn’t simply for purely cosmetic reasons. It was psychological reasons.”

Hart admitted encouraging or assisting the commission of an offence, believing it would be committed.

Jeffrey Jones, defending Hart, said: “He allowed himself to be used in that by making one gesture, in relation to one matter – his own address.”

Gunter was jailed for two years, while her husband was jailed for six months.

Judge Peter Heywood told the couple: “That fraud occurred over a significant period of time. There was a degree of sophistication and planning involved.”

Speaking to Gunter, he said: “You have engaged in a significant course of dishonest conduct for a considerable period of time.”

To her husband he said: “You foolishly, Mr Hart, went along by providing false information, knowing full well what the full situation was.”

Source

The cost of disabled blue badge fraud

$
0
0
A crackdown on fraud and misuse of the Blue Badge is being supported by Worcestershire County Council. (h/t Fraudmanager)

Community and environmental protection officers, civil enforcement officers and council officials from across the county will be actively inspecting Blue Badges in locations with on-street disabled parking and district car parks looking for those who misuse or illegally hold Blue Badges.

The crackdown is being led by all the district councils and is a county-wide scheme.

When a badge is misused, genuine Blue Badge holders lose out on access to disabled parking bays which are closer to shops and services, to allow for easier accessibility and wider to accommodate using a mobility aid.

From a survey of English Councils by the European Institute for Combating Corruption & Fraud, the cost of detecting blue badge fraud in 2014/15 was £2.2m.

Government statistics state there are currently 2.6 million blue badges in circulation and estimates misuse of the blue badge concession to be as high as 20 per cent, with a total cost to the UK economy of £46 million.

Source

2.6 million people who are not too disabled to be driven around, but who need a special parking badge? 

That seems pretty niche. Yet seemingly over 3.5% of the population need a disabled blue badge? Surely those badges are hugely over-issued.

Housing fraudster jailed

$
0
0
A fraudster who used another man’s identity to gain a council job and home as well as thousands in benefits has been jailed, a London council has reported. (h/t Fraudmanager)

An investigation by Royal Greenwich revealed Christian Ikediashi, formerly of Dawson Close, Woolwich, had used the identity documents of another man to get a job as a waste operative with the council in October 2009.

Mr Ikediashi held the post until 2013 when he was dismissed for continuous absence.

In 2010, he then used the same identity to submit a housing application to Royal Greenwich. He was given a one bedroom flat in May 2013.

The investigation also found that from August 2012 to July 2016 Mr Ikediashi had obtained Housing Benefit totalling £13,595 with the same false identity and papers.

Officers in the Royal Borough’s Internal Audit & Anti-Fraud team became suspicious when a National Fraud Initiative data matching exercise found that the man who Mr Ikediashi pretended to be had a council tenancy in another London borough.

Mr Ikediashi was charged with four Fraud Act offences and two offences under the Social Security Administration Act 1992. Cllr Maureen O’Mara, cabinet member for Customer Services, said: ‘This is a great example of the good results that can come from partnership working between the Royal Borough and various agencies. Had it not been for the National Fraud Initiative identifying that two council tenancies were held in the same identity this case may have never come to notice and Mr Ikediashi would have continued to defraud us of a much needed Council home. With the Royal Borough investigators collating all the evidence and locating him in Manchester there was only going to be one outcome for Mr Ikediashi and I am pleased to hear he has now gone to prison.’

‘Thanks should also go the Greater Manchester Police who assisted our officers all the way,’ she added.

Source

Social housing fraud is wicked, because it denies a home to someone needy.

Council social worker jailed for £67k benefit fraud

$
0
0
A social worker has been jailed for more than a year after illegally claiming £67,000 of benefits.

Deborah Carmichael, 47, submitted a claim to the Department of Work and Pensions in 2004 for a number of mental and physical illnesses. But she failed report the changes in her circumstances the following year when she returned to work.

Glasgow Sheriff Court heard Carmichael falsely claimed £67,247 between August 2005 and March 2016.

Carmichael, from Knightswood, Glasgow admitted "knowingly failing to give prompt notification" to the DWP and claiming money she wasn't entitled to.

Sheriff Bill Totten jailed Carmichael, who works for Glasgow City Council, for 16 months.

He told her: "You must understand the serious nature of this offence. There can be no alternative but to impose a prison sentence.

"I sympathise as any right thinking person should with the very real problems and difficulties you have experienced." But the sheriff added Carmichael "must have been well aware" of the serious nature of her crime.

Source

Her fraud lasted over ten years - even though she was back working with the council which had previously employed her.

Benefit claimant hid family income

$
0
0
A benefit claimant failed to declare his wife was self-employed and had run a catering business for six years, a court heard.

John Francis’ initial income support claim, in 1995, was genuine, as he suffered a level of disability. Durham Crown Court heard it became employment support allowance, in 2013.

Vince Ward, prosecuting, said: “He declared there was no household income, so he was afforded those benefits, but what he did not declare was that his wife was self-employed in a catering business, from April 2008.”

Mr Ward said inquiries revealed that Francis’ wife was registered for VAT at the time, while the defendant was insured as a van driver and described as a company ‘employee’.

Despite denials in three interviews, between August 2015 and the following January, Francis, 59, from Langley Moor, Durham, admitted four counts of benefit fraud at a magistrates’ court hearing.

The case was sent to crown court for sentence, due to the level of overpayment, said to be £70,096, between 2008 and 2014.

Angus Taylor, for Francis, said he suffered osteoarthritis, a legacy of working as a diesel fitter for an hgv transport company, which led to the initial claim.

Mr Taylor said in time it is hoped, “a solution can be found to suit all parties as to repayment”

Recorder Ben Nolan said he was conscious of the defendant’s on-going health problems, and imposed a 12-month prison sentence, suspended for two years.

A crime proceeds’ confiscation hearing has been provisionally listed for the court ... next May.

Source

Illegal immigrants in social housing fraud

$
0
0
A former Erith resident has been sentenced to 18 months imprisonment after she pretended to be homeless to gain accommodation. (h/t TenancyFraud)

Annebel Nwanebi, formerly of Pembroke Road, did not have legal status in the UK, but fraudulently claimed to be the homeless partner of Charles Douglas, a European national entitled to housing.

The case was heard at the Inner London Crown Court in August.

Sentencing, Judge Wright QC said it was a "sophisticated and enduring fraud" recognising that "social housing is in short supply in London and your actions deprived a family of that."

Ms Nwanebi had approached the London Borough of Bexley for housing in August 2014, claiming that she, her partner, Charles Douglas, and their family were homeless, having been evicted from their previous privately rented accommodation.

They were given temporary accommodation in Dartford.

In April 2015, Ms Nwsanebi and Mr Douglas were nominated for a newly-built home in Erith Park estate, but an employee of Orbit housing association suspected their case was fraud and investigated with council officers.

On visiting the temporary accommodation, the tenancy fraud officer found Ms Nwanebi living there with her husband and son – not with Mr Douglas.

During the investigation, there was no trace of Mr Douglas. His identity and status as an EEA national was being used to get social housing because Ms Nwanebi and her husband did not have a legal status in the UK.

Cabinet member for adult services, Councillor Brad Smith, said: “By passing down a custodial sentence, the Judge in this case has sent a clear message to anyone who thinks they can obtain accommodation illegally. We won’t think twice about prosecuting anyone who takes away the chance of a home for a law abiding family who are in genuine need.”

Ms Nwanebi was found guilty of making false representations to obtain accommodation and sentenced to 18 months imprisonment.

Andrew Meyer, head of housing at Orbit, said: “The sentence given is reflective of the deception committed by Ms Nwanebi and sends out a strong message to anyone contemplating a similar act."

Source

Former council leader convicted of benefit fraud

$
0
0
A former Labour town council leader was exposed as a disability benefit cheat after falsely claiming he could walk “zero metres for zero minutes” because of severe pain.

Department of Work and Pensions investigators filmed Robert Woodbridge carrying out everyday tasks seemingly with ease.

On several occasions he was seen carrying items to his car, driving, walking up and down steep steps, pulled a trailer and even building a shed at his allotment.

Woodbridge, who later stood in elections for the Green Party and Liberal Democrats, denied dishonestly failing to notify a change of circumstances, claiming he had good days and bad days, but he was convicted by a jury in just 20 minutes.

The 58-year-old former Swanley Town Council leader, who suffered from inflammatory arthritis, claimed a higher rate of disability living allowance he was not entitled to, Maidstone Crown Court was told.

Prosecutor Edmund Fowler said Woodbridge initially made a legitimate claim for the allowance in 1997. But after he renewed his claim in December 2013 he received a higher rate “care component” paid on the basis he needed help both day and night and a higher rate mobility component payable on the basis he was virtually unable to walk.

“We are not questioning the basis of his initial application,” said Mr Fowler. “This case is about what happened subsequently, because it came to light that his mobility and care needs had improved. He failed to declare a change of circumstances to the DWP, as required.”

As a result, he received an overpayment of £3,354 between August 12 2015 and January 26 last year.

Mr Fowler said Woodbridge’s renewal form stated a number of things that no longer applied.

“He said he could walk zero metres for zero minutes before feeling severe pain,” he told a jury of eight men and four women. “The pain started as soon as he got up and started walking. He used sticks to walk. He stumbled, tripped and fell often. His days were mostly the same as the pain was always there. He suffered pain in his knees and ankles when he walked and was unable to stand for long.

“The Crown say there was a change in those circumstances. He talks of aids, handrails on stairs, pain and discomfort in his wrists and knees, walking sticks to help walk in and out of doors.”

Woodbridge stated: “Pain and discomfort starts when I start walking as soon as I get up. Walking is extremely poor. I can only walk with the support of sticks. I have sharp pain in my knees and ankles which cause me to fall.”

He said he needed help to get up and to go to the toilet. He needed help seven days a week as the pain was always there. He could not get in and out of bed on his own and it took him about 15 minutes to get down the stairs.

Woodbridge, who attended council meetings twice a week, said he could not use the TV remote control.

Mr Fowler said when surveillance was carried out investigators saw Woodbridge appear to walk without a stick, crossing roads, climbing up to particular places and spending time apparently independently. In a film clip he was shown putting his walking stick into a wheelbarrow.

“It appears he was able to build a shed sawing and hammering while at his allotment, using his foot to steady a plank as he was sawing,” Mr Fowler told the jury of eight men and four women. “You can see there was a very different set of circumstances to what was set out in that claim form, and when there is a change in circumstances there is a duty to inform the DWP. The duty is to give a prompt notification for any change. The Crown say the defendant acted dishonestly in all this.”

Woodbridge gave a prepared statement in which he claimed the severity of his pain fluctuated, and that some days he was immobile and others he could move.

But Mr Fowler added: “The Crown say it was rather convenient that on each day he was filmed he was having a good day.”

Woodbridge, from Swanley, was granted bail until sentence in the week beginning November 27.

Source with picture of him

Mother falsely took over £15k in benefits

$
0
0
A benefit cheat fiddled about £15,900 in overpayments by keeping quiet that she was living with her boyfriend. (h/t Dave)

She was finally confronted by investigators and flatly denied what she had done but soon confessed that she had lied, a court heard.

Lauren Meadows, 27, from Grimsby, admitted two offences of making a false statement to obtain benefit.

Martin Howarth, prosecuting, told Grimsby Magistrates' Court that Meadows was overpaid by a total of £15,904. It was made up of Income Support and housing benefit and included the sums of about £5,860 and about £10,040 between January 16, 2014 and May 2 last year.

Her baby son was born but she did not declare that she was living with her boyfriend. She later "flatly denied" that they were living together and that he only occasionally stayed over but, two hours later, telephoned the authorities to admit that she had lied earlier and that they lived together.

Mr Howarth said that the benefit claim seemed to be fraudulent from the outset because the boyfriend was already living there when the claim was made.

The probation service told the court that Meadows was aware that her actions were wrong but she was under extreme pressure at the time.

She originally intended the false claim to last only three or four months but she "wanted security for her and her son" and she "could see no other option at the time".

She was still on benefit and had debts to utility companies and the council.

Rebecca Perrin, mitigating, said Meadows had ongoing issues but would do whatever she could to stay out of trouble. She had no previous convictions.

District judge Daniel Curtis told Meadows: "There is a significant period of time that this took place and a significant amount of public money. I don't imagine that the money you took resulted in a luxurious lifestyle or anything like that."

Meadows said: "I know I have done wrong."

She was given a 16-week suspended prison sentence, 80 hours' unpaid work, 10 days' rehabilitation and was ordered to pay £85 costs and a Government-imposed £115 victims' surcharge.

Source with picture

Sunday league footballer claimed disability benefits

$
0
0
He goes past one, then another player, then lays the ball off like a pro. (h/t Dave)

Gary Wilson, 30, looks like any other half-decent player as he dribbles with the ball, slide tackles and shoots at goal in a 48-second clip.

But Wilson was claiming a total of £14,000 in benefits and telling the DWP that he couldn't even walk while starring for Sunday League side Steelman's Lounge FC.

Wilson, 30, was caught by hidden cameras while raking in state handouts after claiming that he was crippled, while playing for his Sunday League 11-a-side team.

The footage, filmed by DWP investigators on February 28 last year, shows Wilson playing as a striker wearing the number 9 shirt. He can be seen displaying bursts of pace, going on mazey runs and tackling opposition players - without showing any signs of discomfort.

According to his profile on the Loft FC website Gary "Gaz" Wilson once secured a pro contract with Newcastle United FC until an injury ended his career. The dad-of-three describes his best moment as "Signing 1st Pro Contract @ Newcastle Utd" and his worst as "Getting Injured and having contract at Newcastle terminated". Listed among his previous clubs are the Newcastle School Of Excellence and Newcastle Academy.

Ironically, the Liverpool fan describes his best attribute on the pitch as his pace despite telling the DWP it took him around five minutes to walk 200 yards.

Magistrates heard over a four year period he failed to admit that his capabilities had improved between November 2012 and May last year.

Wilson, of Wolverhampton, admitted to two charges of failure to notify the DWP of a change in circumstance affecting social security benefit.

The defendant, wearing a blue tracksuit, trembled in the dock at Walsall Magistrates Court as sentencing was adjourned due to his ill health.

The matter will now be heard on November 15 at the same court after he was granted unconditional bail.

Adjourning the case, District Judge David Webster told Wilson: "Mr Wilson, it is apparent to anyone who can see you that you are not looking well and I do not want to add to that by having you sit here while sentencing takes place. This will happen on November 15 in the afternoon. I grant you bail to appear before this court on this day at 1.30pm. If you fail to turn up on November 15, that's a separate offence which could result in your imprisonment."

JPs heard how Wilson had also failed to notify the DWP that he had been in reneumerated employment between January 2, 2013 and February 22, 2013.

He also told the DWP he had severe mobility restrictions as well as care requirements due to crippling arthritis in his hip and spine. He said he needed help to put on his shoes and socks and had difficulty getting out of bed and into the bath without assistance. He maintained it took him around five minutes to walk 200 yards, moved three or four times slower than a normal person and also needed crutches to get about.

But the fraudster was caught out playing for Steelman's Lounge FC in Division 6 of the Wolverhampton & District Sunday Football League. He was known as being a "prolific scorer" and scored 26 goals and provided 15 assists in 16 appearances during the 2014/15 season.

According to website stats he was on the pitch for a total of 1,346 minutes and collected two man of the match awards. Stats from the website of another Wolverhampton Sunday League club say he also played for Loft FC.

General Secretary of the league Paul Stone said Wilson would still be allowed to play in the league once he had been sentenced.

He added: "The way we work is that you shouldn't be tried for the same crime twice. Once he's served whatever punishment he receives he will be fine to play as long as he is still not fraudulently claiming benefits."

Nobody from the club was available for comment.

Source with pictures

Benefit cheat illegally claimed £40,000 after her children were taken into care

$
0
0
A benefits cheat described as “calculating and manipulative” has been jailed after claiming more than £40,000 illegally after her children were taken into care. (h/t Dave)

Jane Clark, 42, was sentenced at Cardiff Crown Court after pleading guilty to three counts of benefit fraud on the day her trial was due to take place.

The defendant claimed a total of £43,914 that she was not entitled to, which saw her defraud the Department of Work and Pensions (DWP), HMRC, and Cardiff council.

The court heard Clark had failed to notify the relevant authorities in February 2010 that two of her children had been taken into care.

In total she received £12,000 in disability in disability living allowance as well as £3,500 in carer’s allowance and £3,000 in income support. The claims for carer’s allowance and income support were false from the outset but claims for disability living allowance were initially valid.

Clark also claimed child tax credits in late 2011 and late 2012, which were fraudulent from the outset, which led her to illegally benefiting to the tune of £24,000. She also pleaded guilty to illegally claiming £265 in housing benefit.

Defending, Nathalie Carter told the court her client was “not a lady of great sophistication” and had been taken advantage of by her ex-husband and other partners.

She said: “(Clark) had a difficult start in life and was abandoned at the beginning and placed in the care of her grandparents. She lacks the sophistication to make fraudulent claims from the outset without the encouragement of others. She was a willing participant but she does lack the sophistication. She’s rather isolated and apart from her direct family has little contact with the outside world. She has a great deal of dependence on her male partners over the last 20 years or so. She knows how serious this offending is and she is fearful of the sentencing options available to the court. She is vulnerable and won’t cope well in prison.”

Sentencing, Judge Michael Fitton QC said justice would only be served if Clark received an immediate custodial sentence because of the huge sum she had benefited from.

He said: “There’s more to you than simply the points that are expressed in which I am urged to show you sympathy. You are capable of being quite calculated and manipulative and it seems to me in denying matters to the last moment at the door of the trial you have actually undermined a great deal of what has been said by your counsel today. These are serious and collected offences and you’re in no position to offer payment in compensation or to do unpaid work. It can only be met by an immediate custodial term.”

Clark, from Llanrumney , was sentenced to a total of 34 weeks imprisonment.

Donna James, DWP senior leader for south Wales, said: “It’s an excellent opportunity to have worked with tax credits on the case with the local authority and it’s an excellent example of joint working. It proves that benefit fraud is a crime and people who do commit this crime will get caught.”

Of course it proves nothing of the kind. A joined up benefits system would have caught these false claims at the start.

Source

Assets benefit frauds

$
0
0
The reports of benefit frauds are stacking up, so here are two reports of the same type of fraud. Most benefits are means tested, but these offenders' means made them ineligible for those benefits. Which they claimed anyway.

We call these "assets benefit frauds". This blog's view is that these people should be charged twice as much as they stole. The money obviously matters to them, so hit them where it hurts.


A benefit cheat who claimed nearly £10,000 in benefits she was not entitled to has been ordered to repay the money.

Diane Cornes pleaded guilty to three offences of dishonestly failing to disclose information to make a gain for herself.

The 62-year-old, from Burslem, was last month sentenced to a 12-month community order with a rehabilitation activity requirement for 20 days and an eight-week curfew from 8pm to 6am. Now Judge Jinder Singh Boora has ruled that Cornes benefited from her criminality by £9,866.89 and has so far repaid £464.96 leaving £9,401.93 outstanding.

He ordered that sum to be paid under the Proceeds of Crime Act in three months or she will serve six months in prison in default.

Stoke-on-Trent Crown Court heard Cornes made a claim for Employment Support Allowance (ESA) in February 2013 and stated she had £2,550 in the bank, when she had at least £25,000. And she continued to claim benefits until December 2015 despite, at one stage, having £80,000 in the bank and never having less than £30,000.

Source with picture

A benefits cheat who dishonestly claimed more than £30,000 had more than £50,000 in his bank account after receiving money from an inheritance.

Constantino Fenu, 63, was sentenced at Cardiff Crown Court after he pleaded guilty to seven counts of benefit fraud on the first day of his trial.

The court heard that Fenu, from Cardiff , received benefits he was not entitled to including housing benefit, council tax benefit, and jobseekers’ allowance between 2009 and 2011.

The defendant had failed to notify Cardiff council and the DWP that he had received an inheritance which meant he was no longer entitled to receive benefits.

During this time Fenu had up to £53,000 sitting in his bank account and the lowest amount in his account was £26,000.

When his fraud was uncovered by the council and DWP Fenu had illegally benefited to the tune of £33,633.

In his police interview he admitted he had not been entirely truthful but he denied being guilty of the offences, claiming he did not understand the paperwork.

He was due to stand trial but changed his plea to guilty before the trial could begin. The defendant is now paying £200 a month and has paid back almost £20,000 of the amount he claimed illegally. He has taken up a temporary job as a postman for Royal Mail during the Christmas period.

Sentencing, Judge Stephen Hopkins QC said: “You have by a cat’s whisker avoided an immediate custodial sentence. You knew the amount of inheritance you received would affect the amount of benefit you were entitled to. You are an intelligent man so don’t be so stupid in future.”

Fenu was sentenced to eight months imprisonment suspended for two years and was ordered to carry out 80 hours of unpaid work.

Source


Single parent frauds

$
0
0
Single parent frauds are all too common, and difficult to detect.

A woman who took part in karate competitions while claiming disability benefits has been jailed for 15 months. Claire Thomas, 47, from Gloucester, was convicted of fraud after being filmed training and taking part in tournaments.

The DWP said Thomas had claimed £72,000 in benefits she was not entitled to.

Sentencing at Gloucester Crown Court, Gordon Bebb QC said: "You milked the system as far as you could for years. It's people like you who cause members of the public to lose faith in the system when they see money being wasted on you that could go somewhere else".

Thomas told jurors she had "brittle" asthma and struggled with diabetes and high blood pressure. However, the court was shown covertly filmed video of the 47-year-old training, competing in tournaments and being presented with medals.

Her principal fraud was to pretend she was a single mother while living with her husband and was therefore not maintaining a common household which would make her ineligible for benefits.

Thomas, who had a conditional discharge for benefit fraud in Bristol in 1998, was found guilty on Wednesday after a three-day trial.

Source with pictures

A Calderdale woman committed benefit fraud when she failed to tell the council that she was living with her partner.

Kirklees magistrates heard that Harriot Brown’s claim for housing benefit when she moved to a new address was fraudulent from the outset.

Vanessa Jones, prosecuting, said that between July 2014 and June 2015 she was overpaid £3,142 by Calderdale Council as a result of the fraud. The 30-year-old, who runs her own cleaning business, pleaded guilty to dishonestly making a false statement to obtain a benefit.

She applied for housing benefit on the basis that she was single parent of three children, Mrs Jones said. Brown explained that her relationship was on/off and at the time when she made the claim to the council her partner had left and she didn’t think that he would be back.

She said she didn’t consider herself to be in a relationship but admitted that when her partner came back to the house she should have informed the authorities.

Brown, from Halifax, was sentenced to a community order with 80 hours of unpaid work. She will have to pay £85 costs and £85 victim surcharge.

Source

Another asset benefit fraud

$
0
0
A benefit cheat who falsely claimed disability living allowance has been ordered to pay back £44,000 or face jail.

Andrew Robert Howarth, from Rawtenstall, pleaded guilty at Burnley Crown Court to benefit fraud and was given a 12-month jail sentence, suspended for two years.

At a proceeds of crime hearing this week, prosecutor Anthony Stephenson told the court that the 50-year-old wrongly claimed £44,893.25.

The court heard how the defendant had £144,710.92 in ‘available assets’ including two houses, a small ISA and a savings account.

Mr Stephenson said Howarth has ‘already started to make some payments back’.

Howarth was ordered to pay the remaining sum of £43,473.95 in the next three months or face nine months in jail in default.

Judge Ian Leeming QC told Howarth: “If you find it impossible to pay then you can come back to court and apply for an extension, but that would depend on its merits.”

Source

Calculating £83k benefit thief mother gets off lightly

$
0
0
A woman cheated the benefits system out of more than £83,000 by lying to officials over an seven year period.

Kelly Samantha Delaney, from Leicester, admitted four counts of benefit fraud when she claimed to be living as a single mother, despite marrying in December 2007.

The 39-year-old mother-of-two, now living at Humberstone, was sentenced at Leicester Crown Court this week after changing her plea ahead of a scheduled trial.

Lynsey Knott, prosecuting, said: "Essentially, between December 24, 2007, and May 29, 2015, the defendant claimed various benefits - including housing benefit; council tax benefit; child tax credits; income support, and employment support allowance. She claimed each benefit as a single parent of dependant children, despite being married, receiving £83,370 in total." The offences happened while Delaney was living at her former address in Keyham Lane West, Hamilton.

Ms Knott said that two of the charges relate to dishonestly claimed housing benefits and council tax payments by failing to notify Leicester City Council of a change in circumstances, when living in the same household as her husband Jason Delaney between December 12, 2007 and March 31, 2013.

Delaney admitted making a dishonest representation to the DWP in relation to income support, by allegedly failing to declare she was living as a married woman with her husband on May 24, 2008.

Mrs Knott said: "Between 2008 and 2014, she received an overpayment of income support totally £21,500. In June 2014 the defendant notified the Department for Work and Pensions that she had returned to work. As a result, she was then receiving between July 24 and mid-October- employment support allowance as a single mother of dependent children, representing an overpayment of £910."

Steven Bailey, defending, said: "My client is remorseful." He said she married in haste and that her marriage had begun to fail within just five weeks of the wedding, in December 2007, after which Mr Delaney would only stay at her address for one or two nights a week for a period of six years.

Mr Bailey said: "The criminality in this case is she should have been honest and told the relevant authorities. But by putting her head in the sand she made sure that that conversation never happened."

He said Delaney was of previous good character and has struggled with obsessive compulsive disorder, anxiety, panic attacks and depression.

The court heard that a sum of about £3,000 has also been repaid by the defendant.

Judge Nicholas Dean QC said: "I don't accept that your relationship was quite as intermittent as you have tried to convey to this court. £83,000 is a great deal of money and you are not going to get away with this scot-free." He added that it was benefit "cheats" like her that unfairly gave genuine claimants a bad name.

Delaney was sentenced to 15-months in prison for each offence, but to run concurrently and suspended for two years. She will also be subject to a curfew to stay inside her home address between 8pm and 8am for four months, and was ordered to carry out 150 hours of unpaid work in the next 12 months.

Source

Ex boxing champ jailed for illegal sub-letting

$
0
0
A former champion boxer who became an Islamic extremist and supporter of ISIS has been jailed for ten months for illegally sub-letting his home.

Anthony Small, 36, who also won the light middleweight Commonwealth belt, and partner Maryam Malik, 25, charged nearly £1,000 a month to tenants living in two south London housing association properties.

Small, also known as Abdul Haqq, of Camberwell Green, south London was jailed for 10 months while partner Malik, of Stoke-on-Trent, was handed a conditional discharge of two years.

The couple carried out the scam to ‘line their pockets’ by ‘taking advantage of the system’.

Pregnant mother Elisabeth Kovacs was duped by the pair into thinking she was renting a Sydenham home from them in 2016. Small then leased his Camberwell flat to Dimitar Nenov despite belonging to Hexagon Housing Association, who supply social homes for those in need.

Their crime came to light after a handyman came round to fix a boiler in their Sydenham property while Ms Kovacs was living there. The engineer quickly realised she was unaware that the home belong to the local housing association, and alerted the authorities.

Small reached the height of his fighting career in 2009 when he became British and Commonwealth champion but quit the ring in 2010 as it clashed with his extremist take on Islam. He became a follower of the banned terror group Al Muhajiroun and a close associate of hate preacher Anjem Choudary.

In 2015 he was cleared of plotting to travel to Syria to fight with ISIS and was also found not guilty of disseminating terrorist publications and supporting a proscribed group. But he later said victims of the Westminster Bridge attacks, in which four people were killed, would burn in ‘hellfire’ on his Youtube channel. In September 2014, he released a video stating that the beheadings of American journalists, Steven Sotloff and James Foley, were ‘retaliation’ and not ‘unprovoked’.

But while criticising the British government as ‘crusaders’ Small cheated the taxpayer and took advantage of the dwindling council housing stock. His partner Malik said she did not know she could not sub-let the property without permission as she did not read the contract.

Judge Andrew Baillie told them: ‘Each of you sub-let housing association properties of which you were a tenant. It happened within a few weeks of one another and although you both deny it I have no doubt you knew what each of the other was doing. I have no doubt you acted deceptively intending to deceive the housing association and sub tenants.

‘Malik – you are of good character. There are many good things about you. You have three young children. You deserve some punishment but you have been considered unfit for unpaid work. A curfew doesn’t make much sense considering the volatility of what your home may be in the next few months. With three children anything I order you to pay financially would be counter productive for the upbringing of those three children.

‘I’m going to take an unusual course. I’m going to order a conditional discharge for the next two years. Any judge who sees this will think you got off lightly. I do not recommend you come back.

‘Small – bearing in mind your previous record and particularly the fact these offences were committed during the operational period of a suspended sentence I can’t take any other action but to impose an immediate prison sentence. I’m not going to take into account that during the course of the trial you indicated your hostility to the criminal justice system including the police and the court system. I haven’t found that particularly surprising but it’s fairly childish to fail to disguise it. I found some of your social and domestic views distinctly unattractive but I have no intention of sentencing you for those thoughts but those offences you have been convicted of by a jury and the consequential effect on your suspended sentence.’

Southern Housing Association may yet bring their own proceedings against Small, whilst Hexagon Housing has started proceedings to repossess Malik’s property, which she is appealing.

Small was sentenced to six months for one count of fraud and three months for one count of unlawful subletting to run consecutively. He was sentenced to four months imprisonment for breaching his suspended sentence of 32 weeks imposed for 12 months. He was also ordered to pay a victim surcharge of £130 but no unlawful profit order was made as he would be unable to pay it from prison.

He was also accused of assaulting Ms Kovacs but was cleared of that charge and two of unlawful harassment.

Malik was handed a conditional discharge of two years for one count of fraud and one count of unlawful subletting. She was ordered to pay costs of £200 under an unlawful profit order at a rate of £10 per month and a victim surcharge of £20. She was acquitted on two counts of unlawful harassment.

More here

Mother in £26k benefit fraud

$
0
0
A mother-of-two who banked £26,000 of tax payers’ money in a two-year benefit fraud has avoided jail.

Tanya Comber failed to alert Maidstone Borough Council when her partner moved into her home and continued to claim housing benefits and income support.

The 47-year-old took home £9,000 in income support while £17,000 was credited to her bank account during the swindle between 2014 and 2016.

Maidstone Magistrates’ Court heard Comber had built up a mountain of debt during a legal wrangle over her six-year-old son.

Andrew Jones, prosecuting, said she was paid income support and housing benefits on the basis she was a lone parent and had no other income.

“The money was paid directly into a bank account,” he said. “In interview she admitted she had been living with her partner and told the investigator she knew her benefits would stop if she told them about the change in circumstances, but she had a lot of debt.”

Comber admitted two counts of dishonestly failing to notify change of circumstances affecting entitlement to social security benefit and will now begin paying back the thousands of pounds she owes.

Defending the barmaid and cleaner, Geoff Playford told magistrates she had struggled financially during a problem with her former partner: “There were a lot of things going on in Miss Comber’s life at the time. Her son was effectively retained by her former partner and the result was she had to take him to court to get a civil order to get him back. She is remorseful and she accepts responsibility.”

Chairman of the Bench Andrew Backway handed Comber a 120-day prison sentence, suspended for 18 months, and ordered her to carry out 150 hours of unpaid work.

He said: “We accept arrangements have been made for that money to be repaid.”

He said her early guilty plea was the reason she was not going to prison. Comber was also ordered to pay a £115 victim surcharge and court costs of £85.

Source with picture
Viewing all 1267 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>