Quantcast
Channel: Benefit fraud
Viewing all 1267 articles
Browse latest View live

Costs order for social housing fraud

$
0
0
A family have been evicted from the three-bedroom house they were living in and ordered to pay £30,000 after it was discovered the social housing tenant who was supposed to be living there was actually living somewhere else.

Following an anonymous tip-off, Circle Housing worked alongside Hackney Council’s fraud investigations team and found the home in Forston Street, Shoreditch, was occupied by Margaret Nelson’s daughter Amanda Murray, 51, and her family, while 73-year-old Mrs Nelson – the tenant – lived in Sunnyhill Close with her husband.

Mrs Nelson, her daughter, and her husband Liam Murray, 52, and son Lee Murray, 29, were ordered to pay costs of £30,000 at the Royal Courts of Justice on March 11.

Under the recently introduced Prevention of Social Housing Fraud Act 2013, tenancy fraud is now a criminal offence that can lead to a two-year prison sentence and unlimited fine.

Mrs Nelson was accused of a “breathtaking” scope of lies, including that she was unable to read, whilst her daughter was accused of “lying like a trooper”.

Although Circle Housing Circle 33 conceded that Mrs Nelson was a regular visitor to Forston Street, it says she had not lived there for at least a decade.

Defence counsel argued that the fact Mrs Nelson stayed overnight in Sunnyhill Close did not necessarily mean that Forston Street was not her main home, and criticised a “flawed investigation”.

Avril Drummond, customer service manager for Circle Housing Circle 33, said housing fraud is taken “very seriously”.

She added: “Every home not occupied by the registered tenant costs taxpayers around £18,000 a year and prevents families on the waiting list and in need of a home from moving into a property. This case demonstrates the important role played by the local community as well as the local authorities in tackling tenancy fraud.”

The social housing property is now back in Circle Housing’s possession and will be made available to someone in genuine need of social housing.

In three years Circle Housing Circle 33 has recovered more than 200 homes.

Source

Social housing fraud is the most wicked form of welfare fraud. The sums that can be saved are huge, but it's so much more than the money - needy families are being deprived of the chance to have a settled home that suits their needs.

Pension credit cheat jailed

$
0
0
A benefits cheat granddad will spend eight months behind bars after lying his way to nearly £24,000 in handouts while also having £88,000 in the bank.

Dennis Scott made the false claim that he had only £4,000 - but the crook had just sold a house.

The 65-year-old managed to lie his way to £23,776 in pension credits before he got caught.

He was not entitled to the payments, a court heard, which were received between 2009 and 2014.

Scott admitted to a judge at Hull Crown Court that he lied to the Department of Work and Pensions.

Judge Jeremy Richardson QC told him: "It must be made very clear to you and to anyone like you who is tempted to defraud the state in respect of social security benefits that a prison sentence is likely to follow.

"You flagrantly breached that system by your shameful conduct.

"For a man of your years you ought to know better."

Source

8 months means 3 months as confiscation hearing stalled

$
0
0
A benefit cheat who claimed more than £20,000 despite having a fortune in a Swiss bank account has been released from prison after just three months.

Mother of two Caroline Foxley, from the Cotswolds, was sentenced to eight months in prison on January 19 for claiming benefits while she had about £250,000 stashed in a Swiss bank account.

The 59-year-old, who previously lived in Chipping Campden but is now of no fixed address, had insisted that the money belonged to the father of her children, Dr Kurt Mayer, and could not be touched due to his alleged links with the Mafia in Italy.

She was released from prison on March 27 and attended Gloucester Crown Court today for a confiscation hearing at which the prosecution alleged she had benefited from crime by about £275,000.

However, prosecutor Stephen Mooney said the Crown still has no information about how much money remains in her Swiss bank account so the court cannot yet rule on exactly how much will be confiscated from her under the Proceeds of Crime Act.

Mr Mooney said that if she does not provide evidence about how much remains in her account the court can make an order confiscating the whole sum of about £275,000 from her.

Oh just get on with it. She obviously has reasons for not co-operating.

He reminded the court that the prosecution case at Mrs Foxley's trial last year was that she had put “something in the region of £250,000” into a Swiss bank account while claiming benefits and paying private school fees for her two children.

"The real issue now is how much money is left in the Swiss bank account," he said.

He said he understood that Oliver Wilmott, representing Mrs Foxley, had made “significant progress” in finding out how much is now in the account.

What does this mean?

Recorder Peter Towler agreed to adjourn the hearing until May 13 so that her Swiss bank assets can be discovered and an order made to confiscate the money.

In October last year a jury convicted Mrs Foxley of four offences of failing to notify Cotswold District Council of a change in her entitlement to benefits.

During the trial, Mr Mooney said: "She made a calm, calculated and rational decision to top up her already quite substantial income by making false claims for benefits. This is a thoroughly dishonest woman who decided to get money she knew she was not entitled to in the hope and expectation, and arrogance, that she would not be caught."

But these process-driven officials are still letting her take the law for a fool.

Source

Mother falsely claimed £24k

$
0
0
A benefits cheat mum from Crewe who falsely claimed more than £24,000 has been spared jail.

Paula Mullock, 29, cheated the benefits system by falsely claiming to be a lone parent on a low income.

On March 30, at South and East Cheshire Magistrates Court, Mullock admitted four charges of dishonestly failing to notify a change in circumstances that she knew would affect her entitlement to Housing Benefit, Council Tax Benefit and Income Support.

Her fraud was uncovered by investigators from Cheshire East Council’s benefit investigations team and the DWP.

Magistrates heard that an investigation into Mullock’s claim found that her partner had joined the household in November 2010 and had been supporting her and the family financially.

Despite this, she continued her claim as a lone parent for another three years and six months by providing false statements to the DWP.

As a result, Mullock received a total of £24,694.38 in benefits that she was not entitled to.

Steph Cordon, Cheshire East Council’s head of communities, said: “It is a big mistake for fraudsters to think they can get away with claiming benefits they are not entitled to. They risk being prosecuted and ending up with a criminal conviction for a serious offence of dishonesty. We have a zero-tolerance policy towards benefit fraud because we are determined to ensure that the benefits system works for people who really need help.”

Magistrates sentenced Mullock to 18 weeks imprisonment suspended for 12 months and 100 hours unpaid work for the community. She was also ordered to pay a victim surcharge of £80 and costs of £85.

Source

Suspended sentence for second time fraudster

$
0
0
A couple who cheated Epsom and Ewell Borough Council out of £26,000 in dishonestly claimed benefits have been spared prison.

Linda Parker, 56, and Raymond Clarke, 60, were found guilty of benefit fraud offences.

Sentenced at Guildford Crown Court on Friday, March 27, both were given prison sentences of 26 weeks, suspended for a year, and must adhere to a six-week curfew at their home.

Epsom Council investigated the couple after computer data showed Clarke had lived at the same addresses as Parker, but that information had not been included within her claim for benefits.

Several different documents indicated he had been living at the address, despite claims to the contrary.

In 2011, Parker had been given a caution for a previous fraud offence.

Sentencing, Judge Recorder West said both defendants knew they were not entitled to benefits and had behaved dishonestly, depriving the council of funds for those honestly entitled to them.

He said: "It also persuades the public to look on benefit claimants with distrust. This is a serious amount of money". He concluded by saying the pair’s actions were "lamentable".

Epsom Council is seeking to recover the money.

A spokesman said: "The court has handed down punishments to these fraudsters showing benefit fraud will not be tolerated. These fraudsters live with these suspended sentences hanging over them, as well as having to live with the restrictions imposed by the curfews. People claiming benefit they are not entitled to should be aware fraudsters are getting caught. If anyone else has not declared their true circumstances they should do so - before they are caught."

Source

Nothing terribly bad will happen to them for now. They just have to stay in more for a few weeks.

As Linda Parker had offended before, you might think the council would have kept a special eye on her claims. Evidently not?

Benefit fraudster too old and sick for real punishment

$
0
0
A 73-year-old benefit cheat who dishonestly claimed £69,000 she wasn’t entitled to has walked free from court after a judge decided not to send her straight to prison. (h/t Dave)

Eileen Ray claimed on the forms that she wasn’t living with a partner at her home in Hogarth Road, Ipswich when she was living with her husband Peter Ray, Ipswich Crown Court heard.

Fraud investigators who carried out surveillance on Ray’s home saw her husband regularly coming and going from the property and discovered he had given Hogarth Road as his address to employers and loan companies. During Ray’s trial last month the court heard that a housing officer who visited the property found a number of improvements had been made, including a new kitchen and bathroom and there was also a conservatory, a loft conversion and a log cabin.

Ray denied three offences of making a false representation to obtain benefit, three offences 
of fraud and obtaining order money by deception but was found guilty of all the offences. The offences, which relate to claims for Income Support, Pension Credit, housing benefit and council tax benefit, were committed between 1998-2012.

Sentencing Ray to a 15-month prison sentence suspended for two years Recorder Ian Evans said she had told the probation service she didn’t accept the jury’s verdicts. “That is a fact you have to accept and you have to live with however much you shake your head,” said the judge.

He said that in his opinion she had been convicted of the offences on “overwhelming” evidence. In addition to the suspended prison sentence Recorder Evans made Ray the subject of a six month curfew between the hours of 9am-5pm except pre-arranged medical appointments. Ian Persaud 
for Ray said the benefit overpayment was being taken each week from her benefit payments.

He said Ray was in poor health and there would be grave concerns for her well-being if she was sent to prison.

Source

Mother jailed for £110k benefit fraud

$
0
0
A mother from Shirley has been jailed after admitting £110,000 worth of benefit fraud.

Teresa Kearney, 49, told Croydon Council she was a single parent when she had been living with her husband.

An anonymous tip-off prompted a joint investigation by the council and the Department for Work and Pensions.

They found that, over a period of six years, Kearney had pocketed £110,845.97 in benefits she wasn't entitled to.

Kearney pleaded guilty to five counts of dishonestly making false representations to obtain benefits.

She was sentenced to 12 months in prison at Croydon Crown Court on Wednesday.

Richard Simpson, the council's director of finance and assets, said: "This was a prolonged fraud which deprived the hard-working and honest taxpayer out of tens of thousands of pounds.

"We are grateful for the anonymous tip-off which led to this prosecution. It goes to show how we rely on members of the public to tell us about any suspected benefit fraudsters.

"Where we believe fraud is being carried out, we will always investigate and see that those culpable are dealt with by the courts."

Source

Mother lied about her husband's employment

$
0
0
A mother of two has avoided jailed after fraudulently claiming more than £19,000 in benefits. (h/t A Reader)

Lori Marriott, 23, told the Department for Work and Pensions and Cheshire East Council her husband was not working when he was.

As a result she was overpaid housing benefit, council tax benefit and council tax support.

The fraud, which stretched over three years, was discovered when the council ‘data matched’ information Marriott had given.

Marriott, from Wilmslow, admitted two charges of dishonestly failing to notify a change of circumstances affecting entitlement to social security benefit, and one charge of failing to give notice of a change affecting entitlement to council tax reduction.

She was given an 18-week prison sentence suspended for 12 months and a community order with supervision.

Macclesfield Magistrates’ Court heard that between 2009 and 2011 Marriott correctly advised the council of changes to her circumstances when her husband who was then her boyfriend began living with her.

The court heard that the couple were in and out of work during that time.

Then in July 2011 Marriott stopped telling the council the truth about his earnings, prosecutors told the court.

As a result Marriott falsely claimed housing benefit between July 25, 2011, and June 22, 2014, council tax benefit between July 25, 2011, and March 31, 2013, and council tax support between April 1, 2013, and July 9, 2014.

Aoife Ryan, prosecuting on behalf of the council, said: “In June 2014 as part of a data matching process it was discovered that her husband had been in paid employment through a number of companies which were not declared to the council. Further investigation found two undeclared bank accounts in his name.”

The court heard that the total fraud was for £19,301 and include £16,402 housing benefit, £1,743 in council tax benefit, and £1,156 in council tax support benefit.

A report from probation services found Marriott had been ‘kept in the dark’ by her husband over his income.

Raj Chopra, defending, said: “Her husband never told her what he earned and just gave her £50 housekeeping. She should have been proactive.”

Source and picture

Woman stole £17k benefits

$
0
0
A 48-year-old Aughton woman was given a suspended jail sentence after illegally claiming £17,082.60 in benefits.

At Ormskirk Magistrates Court Deborah Coates admitted to failing to notify West Lancashire Borough Council's Benefits Service and the Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) she had savings of £25,000 when she applied for housing benefit in July 2011. The legal limit for savings a claimant may have to qualify for benefits is £16,000.

Between July 2011 and September 2012 Ms Coates was overpaid housing benefit of £8,375.91 and council tax benefit of £1,911.80. Between July 2011 and December 2012, she was overpaid employment support allowance (ESA) of £6,794.89.

Ms Coates, who has repaid the falsely claimed ESA and housing benefit, was sentenced to 16 weeks imprisonment, suspended for 12 months, and issued with a 12 month community order.

She must also pay £315 court costs and an £80 victim surcharge. The council tax benefit she has falsely claimed is still outstanding, and the council will pursue this.

This benefit fraud case was uncovered by the Council's Benefits Investigation Team, who worked in conjunction with DWP investigators. Anyone who falsely claims Social Security Benefits must repay them in full.

Source

Benefit fraud in Northern Ireland

$
0
0
Benefit fraudsters are being caught stealing £5 million a year from tax payers in Northern Ireland. (h/t Dave)

Yet officials have only been able to claw back a fraction of the stolen cash. Last year £4,986,672 was pinched by benefit cheats and only £302,000 was recovered.

The shocking figures have also revealed almost £20million was paid to fraudsters between 2010 and 2014 and only £3million was recovered by the Department of Social Development.

And it is believed an other £13million goes undetected in benefit fraud annually.

The figures were released to Belfast Live after it emerged a woman who admitted defrauding the public purse of almost £101,000 is now paying back just £10 a week.

This means it will take her 100 years to repay the money she stole, after failing to inform authorities she was living with the father of her children.

Diana Majors, 34, of Shanlea Drive in Larne, escaped jail and was instead ordered to do 100 hours of community service.

When she was arrested she denied that the owner of the house where she was living, was also her partner and father of her children - until the police produced birth certificates proving he was the dad.

According to DSD, the maximum amount of money that can be deducted from any claimant who has defrauded the system is £18.25 a week.

SDLP MLA Dolores Kelly said: “The penalties need to be real, they need to be a deterrent. The recovery figures are laughable.”

According to the figures released through a Freedom of Information request, a total of 4,343 people were found to be fraudulently claiming money over the four year period.

The largest total amount of money paid out as a result of a fraudulent claim during that time was a whopping £114,561.

The figures only include cases where fraudulent claims have been identified and it is believed the cost to the taxpayer is much more. It is understood DSD officials estimate the cost to the public purse in respect of social security benefits in 2013 alone was £16.1m.

TUV MLA Jim Allister said: “These figures show the system is obviously being inadequately policed and individuals are not being properly pursued. This is an inordinate amount of money that is being taken out of the system that could go towards more deserving claimants.”

Tommy Docherty's granddaughter admits benefit fraud

$
0
0
The granddaughter of former Manchester United manager Tommy Docherty has admitted falsely claiming almost £18,000 in benefits.

Amy Wilkinson, 28, claimed housing benefit and council tax benefit even though she was living in a home owned by her mother and her partner, who was also working.

Wilkinson, who was a British Airways cabin crew attendant, was ordered to pay back a total of £17,604 that she claimed over two years when she appeared at South and East Cheshire Magistrates Court last week.

She admitted two charges of dishonestly making false representations in order to claim housing benefit, Council Tax benefit and income support.

Magistrates sentenced her to 24 weeks' imprisonment suspended for 24 months and ordered her to pay costs of £675 and a victim surcharge of £50.

Her grandfather, Tommy Docherty, now 86, was manager of Manchester United from 1972 until 1977. He was sacked over his affair with the wife of the team's physio in 1977.

Wilkinson, from Knutsford, applied for housing benefit and Council Tax benefit in April 2011, saying that she was on a low income, was living in a privately-rented property and needed assistance with her rent and council tax, a court heard,

She also made a claim for income support to help her and her daughter as she had no other income.

However, investigators from Cheshire East Council's benefit fraud investigation team and the DWP found she had failed to declare that her mother owned the property for which she was claiming housing benefit.

They also discovered that Wilkinson's partner had joined her household in January 2012 and had been supporting her and the family financially.

Over a two-year period, she received a total of £17,604 in state benefits that she was not entitled to. She will have to repay in full the benefits that she fraudulently obtained.

In 2011 she raised more than £10,000 for baby charity Tommy's and was thanked by the Chancellor George Osborne, who is also her local MP. She spent 18 months fundraising after she went into labour at 29 weeks and lost her son, Billy John, who tragically only lived for three minutes. Describing why she raised the money she said at the time: 'I was 29 weeks pregnant when I went into labour but they don't know why, there's just no answer for it. I needed something to focus on. Tommy's has been fabulous with us and on their website, they have a forum where you can talk to other people about it. I never realised how many people have been through what we have been through because at times I thought I was the only one.'

Source

Unemployment falls as welfare reform kicks in

$
0
0
As Fraser Nelson points out.

However could this be...?

"Disabled" badge holder did 191 mile hike

$
0
0
A disability badge holder who claimed he could only walk 200 metres ended up in court after council officials noticed a newspaper report recounting his exploits on a 191-mile hike.

When Paul Gregory, 51, applied to renew his blue badge, he claimed exercise left him breathless, despite being a keen walker and member of a mountaineering club.

He was exposed when Bedford Borough Council staff read an article in The Westmorland Gazette, describing how the 'experienced walker' had been attacked by cows in Cumbria on the third day of a hike in 2012.

The article, which featured a picture of him dressed in walking gear, told how he was knocked over by four cows in a field at the edge of Shap in Cumbria.

The council also found he had spent a weekend walking in Wales days before making a blue badge application.

Gregory, of Bedford, pleaded guilty to two counts of dishonestly obtaining a blue badge by misrepresenting his physical abilities at Luton Magistrates' Court.

He was fined £795, and ordered to carry out 150 hours of unpaid work and pay a £60 victim surcharge. He was also subject to a one year supervision order and told to undergo 19 sessions of 'thinking skills'.

Source

Benefit fraud case takes three years to come to court

$
0
0
A benefits cheat illegally claimed over £27,000 despite owning a Spanish villa and not living in the UK, a court heard.

Dianne Rhodes, 59, claimed income support and council tax benefits for six years after telling authorities she lived in the Hunslet area of Leeds.

Leeds Crown Court heard that throughout the period of offending she was living in the Valencia region of Spain where she owned a villa.

Rhodes was given a 26-week prison sentence, suspended for two years and was ordered to do 100 hours unpaid work after pleading guilty to two offences of failing to notify a change in circumstances and one of making a dishonest representation to obtain benefits. Simon Clegg, prosecuting, said Rhodes’s initial claim for benefits in 2001 were legitimate.

But in 2006 she left her home on Parnaby Drive, Hunslet, to take up residency in Spain after buying a 50 per cent share in a villa. She failed to notify authorities of the move and continued to claim benefits which were paid into her bank account. The offending came to light in 2012 and she was arrested.

Graham Parkin, mitigating, said Rhodes fled the country in 2006 to escape domestic violence but accepted that she failed to notify authorities of a change in circumstances.

Mr Parkin said the property in Spain was worth around £35,000 and was in need of renovation. He said Rhodes had now returned to live in with her daughter and was studying for a languages degree at university.

Judge Neil Clark told Rhodes: “None of that is an excuse for stealing from the public. It amounts to nothing more and nothing less than that. You stole money from members of the public who provide that money for those who really need it.”

Rhodes now faces a confiscation hearing under the Proceeds of Crime Act.

Source

She was arrested in 2012 but not prosecuted until 2015. Now we have to wait for a separate confiscation hearing.

The investigation procedures and the legal process need to be streamlined!

Woman faces eviction after housing benefit fraud

$
0
0
A 43-year-old woman from Fetcham is facing eviction after admitting that she gave false information to obtain social housing.

Mole Valley District Council (MVDC) successfully prosecuted Shamrock Close resident Tara Woodford for housing allocation and benefit fraud.

Redhill Magistrates' Court heard Woodford had obtained a property that she was not entitled to, which could have been allocated to someone in genuine need.

The fraud referral was first raised by her housing provider, Circle Housing Mole Valley.

Investigators established that Woodford's son, who had been declared as her responsibility on her original application, had in fact moved in with his father at the time of the allocation of the property. He lived and attended school in another part of the country.

When interviewed by investigators, Woodford admitted that false information had been provided when applying for housing, and also when making a claim for benefit to help with rental payments.

She was given a conditional discharge for two years and ordered to pay £100 towards court costs and a £15 victim surcharge.

Rachel O'Reilly, the council's head of services, said MVDC and Circle Housing work closely together to identify and investigate allegations of tenancy fraud, with suspected cases being investigated by the council's fraud investigation team:
Social Housing is a scarce resource and residents can wait many months, or even years, before appropriate properties become available.

The Housing Register is administered by MVDC, and properties are allocated based on the genuine needs of the applicant. MVDC is committed to ensuring these applications are robustly checked and investigated and that legal action is taken where fraud is proven.

Anyone convicted of this type of offence will not qualify for social housing for a considerable period of time.
Woodford is now facing separate legal action from Circle Housing Mole Valley with a view to evicting her from the property.

Glynis Gatenby, managing director at Circle Housing Mole Valley, said: "We will always take action against residents found to be committing tenancy fraud as this allows us to return homes to people with a genuine housing need. If you suspect someone of committing fraud in Mole Valley, call the MVDC fraud hotline on 01306 879284. All calls are treated anonymously."

Source

So now we have to wait for another court hearing so that she can be evicted from the social housing she shouldn't have had in the first place. Complacency rules - this process needs to be streamlined.

Reading reports on benefits fraud & blue badge fraud

$
0
0
Benefit claimants have overclaimed more than £277,000 over the past year in Reading, prompting 17 prosecutions.

One benefit fraud case involved a massive £32,000 and Reading Borough Council has succeeded in retrieving the cash through the Proceeds of Crime Act.

From April 2014 to March 2015, the total housing benefit and council tax support overpaid was £214,604 while other state benefit overpayments totalled just under £62,000.

Paul Harrington, chief auditor at the council, was giving an end of year report to the audit and governance committee on Tuesday, April 21.

He said the council team was still working on a “couple of huge cases” alongside the Department of Work and Pensions.

As well as 17 prosecutions, administrative penalties were applied in 11 cases to get cash back without going to court.

Borough staff received 23 reports of housing and tenancy fraud and investigations have led to six council properties being returned to the housing stock and two returned to social landlords.

It is estimated these tenancy investigations have saved the council £108,000 by not having to spend on temporary accommodation for six tenants during the year.

======

Among the most common reports from the public of potential fraud are for Blue Badge users.

During the last year the council has conducted two proactive drives in Reading town centre to check on the legitimate use of Blue Badges entitling parking in disabled parking bays. As a result, 14 cases have been investigated.

Mr Harrington said: “We do get appreciation from members of the public for these investigations.”

The council is currently involved in a “complex investigation into payments made in respect of an adult care provider” and has successfully prosecuted another claimant for fraud and false accounting over personal budget payments.

There have been two linked investigations into potential fraud and perjury involving lawful development certificates where applicants have submitted “fictitious supporting statements in order to secure exemption from the need to apply for planning permission”.

Mr Harrington’s report said: “We are working closely with legal on possible criminal charges for false statements.”

And he concluded in his report: “We have been, and will continue, to work alongside officers from the electoral registration service for the prevention and detection of electoral fraud.”

But commenters aren't impressed with Reading Council's standard of service - see source.

Bedford reports on welfare frauds

$
0
0
A record number of fraudsters targeting Bedford Borough Council have been prosecuted or cautioned in the past year.

Between 2014 and 2015, the council’s Fraud Investigations team successfully took action against 142 offenders - the highest number uncovered in Bedford Borough in a single year.

These cases resulted in the issue of 31 prosecutions, 62 cautions and 48 financial penalties.

A council spokeswoman said the more notable cases included the following;

- 16 months imprisonment for a man who stole more than £138,000 in benefits from the council and the Department for Work and Pensions by failing to declare that he owned a commercial property which he rented out

- 18 months imprisonment for a woman who stole £43,135 in benefits from the council after failing to declare savings and a property in Baghdad

- A fine of £20,000 was received and a further £16,000 confiscated from a woman who failed to declare her ownership of five properties

- A man was found guilty of Blue Badge Fraud and fined £855 and ordered to complete 150 hours of unpaid work after it was discovered he was actually a passionate long-distance walker and a member of a Mountaineering Club

- An £850 fine was issued to a man exaggerating his disability to trick the Council into awarding him a Blue Badge. During his disability assessment, the applicant took almost 4 minutes to walk 25 meters. However, when his assessment was finished, the individual was seen walking 24 metres back to his car in just 27 seconds

- A social housing tenant’s property was recovered after she vacated it to live elsewhere in privately rented accommodation but wanted to keep the Bedford property available for occasional visits to the area.

Source

Woman rented out council property

$
0
0
A woman has been fined a total of £4,533 for benefit fraud and illegally renting out her council property while she lived 200 miles away in Lancashire.

Not enough.

Roshan Adams moved to Ormskirk, Lancashire, and sub-let a council property in Hermon Hill, Wanstead, on two occasions to two different sets of tenants.

She also claimed housing benefit for the property and did not notify the council that she had moved away.

The offence came to light when council staff made a routine visit to the property and discovered correspondence addressed to the flat in the communal area of the property in different names.

The 36-year-old was found guilty of failing to notify the council of a change in her circumstances affecting her entitlement to housing benefit and for sub-letting her council house, at Barkingside Magistrates Court on April 17.

Adams must pay a £110 fine, £20 Victim Surcharge, £370 costs, a £1,089 unlawful profit order for the first sub-let and £2,944 for the second sub-let.

Redbridge council said it strongly encourages residents to anonymously report housing fraud.

Source

And we want the flat back, so that it can be given to someone who genuinely needs it.

Couple jailed for £78k benefits fraud

$
0
0
A Moreton couple who made illegal claims for almost £80,000 over a six year period have been handed jail sentences following a joint prosecution by Cotswold District Council and the Department of Work and Pensions.

Karen Hardiman, 46, and Roger Cross, 39, appeared at Gloucester Crown Court and admitted a total of 10 charges of benefit fraud from 2006 to 2013. Cross also asked for five further charges to be taken into consideration.

After hearing the evidence, the judge sentenced Hardiman to 16 weeks in jail and awarded a longer prison sentence of 26 weeks to Cross because he had previous convictions for burglary.

Hardiman had qualified for benefits legitimately when living as a lone parent, but the situation changed when Cross moved into her home in 2006 and they didn’t declare that her circumstances had changed. For his part, Cross worked as a gardener but did not declare his income.

The pair had pleaded guilty as soon as it came to light that they had been making illegal claims for housing and council tax benefit, income support, jobseeker's allowance and employment and support allowance worth a total of £78,774. Even though there were mental health issues to consider in both cases, the judge was convinced that they had both deliberately sought to defraud the state and were fully aware of their actions.

The judge acknowledged that the couple had not indulged in lavish holidays but pointed out that they had, nevertheless, falsely obtained the equivalent of an extra £17,000 per year, some of which was used to fund Cross’s drug habit.

The couple have agreed to repay some of the money through deductions to future benefits.

Commenting after the verdict, Cotswold District Council’s Director of Corporate Resources, Frank Wilson, said:
The benefits system is a safety net for people who are in need of financial support when they cannot make ends meet. That’s why it is always so galling to hear about people who knowingly try to get more than their fair share through deceitful means.

I am very grateful to the officer at the council who played a major role in uncovering this particular fraud and bringing the perpetrators to justice. This type of work is vital to help safeguard our public finances and ensure that benefits are awarded to those who really need them.
Source

Colchester woman jailed & told to pay compensation

$
0
0
A woman who bought two homes while claiming tens of thousands of pounds in benefits has been jailed.

Deborah Macklin, from Brightlingsea, wrongly claimed £71,348 from Colchester Council over ten years.

She had failed to tell the council she got married in 2002, was living with her husband and had bought two properties in the town.

She admitted six counts of dishonesty and failing to declare her circumstances.

She was sentenced to 15 months behind bars at Chelmsford Crown Court.

She was also told she must pay back the £71,000 in full when she is released, after the court issued a compensation order.

Paul Smith, Colchester Council’s portfolio holder for business and resources, said it was a good result:

“When someone has been found to have been overpaid benefit as a result of fraud we do try to recover the money from them. In a surprising number of cases, such as these, you find people do have other assets. It seems to be more a case of greed rather than these people being desperately poor and needing the money.

“This shows we are becoming more effective at identifying where fraud is taking place and we let other Essex councils know in case the same person has done the same elsewhere. “Thanks to this investigation, it is money we will no longer be paying out to someone who doesn’t need it and instead can be spent on those who do.”

The investigation found Macklin was overpaid £38,274.15 of housing benefit and £6,932.96 of council tax benefit from September 2002 to May 2012, and £26,141.27 of income support from September 2002 to October 2004 and January 2005 to September 2008.

Source
Viewing all 1267 articles
Browse latest View live


<script src="https://jsc.adskeeper.com/r/s/rssing.com.1596347.js" async> </script>